And this is part of the reason why I think a blanket "we don't provide warnings" statement for the entire con is so valuable. Every vid is a risk, even vids whose creators think are perfectly safe.
if not, "We tried and it was difficult enough that I don't think it's worth it". (which isn't to say that she might not mean it another way, just that that's how I read it). I agree that cooperation and a lot of trial and error will be necessary to come up with a workable system, absolutely. But pointing out how hard warnings are and then saying you don't support them and think it's fine for VVC not to have them doesn't sound like "hey, this is harder than we thought, let's try to come up with other solutions", you know?
no subject
And this is part of the reason why I think a blanket "we don't provide warnings" statement for the entire con is so valuable. Every vid is a risk, even vids whose creators think are perfectly safe.
if not, "We tried and it was difficult enough that I don't think it's worth it". (which isn't to say that she might not mean it another way, just that that's how I read it). I agree that cooperation and a lot of trial and error will be necessary to come up with a workable system, absolutely. But pointing out how hard warnings are and then saying you don't support them and think it's fine for VVC not to have them doesn't sound like "hey, this is harder than we thought, let's try to come up with other solutions", you know?