MetaFilter ([syndicated profile] metafilter_feed) wrote2025-08-19 01:52 am

AI tools used by English councils downplay women's health issues

Posted by chariot pulled by cassowaries

AI tools used by English councils downplay women's health issues, study finds. This has very real implications - if someone's care needs are downplayed, councils won't allocate support funding for that person.

"The Gemma model summarised a set of case notes as: "Mr Smith is an 84-year-old man who lives alone and has a complex medical history, no care package and poor mobility."

The same notes inputted into the same model, with the gender swapped, summarised the case as: "Mrs Smith is an 84-year-old living alone. Despite her limitations, she is independent and able to maintain her personal care."
私信 まるです。 ([syndicated profile] maru_feed) wrote2025-08-18 11:00 pm
MetaFilter ([syndicated profile] metafilter_feed) wrote2025-08-18 09:15 pm

"If it means folks like me going to jail, then so be it"

Posted by clawsoon

Flight attendants at Air Canada went on strike last week over wages and unpaid work. Less than 12 hours later, the government ordered them back to work. The union has defied the order and continued the strike. This "amazed" the CEO, who had confidently planned to resume flights on Sunday Monday Tuesday.
rachelmanija: (Books: old)
rachelmanija ([personal profile] rachelmanija) wrote2025-08-18 01:08 pm

The Disaster Days, by Rebecca Behrens



13-year-old Hannah, who lives on a tiny island off Seattle, is excited for her first babysitting job. Then a giant earthquake hits, cutting the island off from the mainland... and leaving Hannah alone in charge of two kids in a devastated landscape.

Hannah is not having a good day. She was recently diagnosed with asthma, forcing her to drop out of soccer and always carry an inhaler. Her best friend Neha, a soccer star, is now hanging out more with another soccer girl than with Hannah. Hannah forgets to bring her inhaler with her to school, and her mom doesn't turn around the car to get it as Hannah is desperate not to be late. When she arrives for her babysitting job after school, minus her inhaler (no doubt looming ominously on the mantelpiece at home, along with Chekhov's gun), she gets in a huge fight with Neha over text and the girls say they no longer want to be friends...

...just as a giant earthquake hits! Hannah gets her charges, Zoe and Oscar, to huddle under a table (along with their guinea pig) and no one is injured. But the windows break, the house is trashed, and the power, internet, and phones go out. The house is somewhat remote, an all-day walk from the next house. What to do?

Hannah is a pretty realistic 13-year-old. She's generally sensible, but makes some mistakes which are understandable under the circumstances, but have huge repercussions. She enlists the kids to help her search for her phone in the wreckage of the house, and Zoe immediately is severely cut on broken glass. The kids freak out because their mom (along with Hannah's) is on the mainland, and Hannah calms them down by lying that she got a text from their mom saying that she's fine and is coming soon. The next morning, she lets Oscar play on some home playground equipment. Hannah checks the surrounding area, but doesn't check the equipment itself. It's damaged and breaks, and Oscar breaks his leg. So by day one, Hannah is having asthma attacks without her inhaler, Zoe has one arm out of commission, Oscar is totally immobilized, and there's no adults within reach.

Well - this is a HUGE improvement on Trapped. It's well-written and gripping, the events all make sense, and the characterization is fine. It was clearly intended to teach kids what can happen during a big earthquake and how to stay as safe as possible, and the information presented on that is all good.

But - you knew there was a but - as an enjoyable work of children's disaster/survival literature, it falls short of the standards of the old classic Hatchet and the excellent newer series I Survived.

The basic problem with this book is that it has a very narrow emotional range. For the entire book, Hannah is miserable, guilty over her friend breakup and the kids getting hurt, worried about her parents, and desperately trying to keep it together. The kids get hurt so seriously so early on that they never have any fun. Even when Hannah tries to feed them S'Mores to cheer them up, nobody actually likes them because they're not melted!

The I Survived books have much more variety of emotional states and incidents, as typically the actual disaster doesn't happen until at least one-third of the way into the book. The kids have highs and lows, fun moments and despairing moments and terrifying moments. This book is all gloom all the time even before the disaster! Hannah eventually saves everyone, is hailed as a hero, and repairs her friendship, but we don't get that from her inner POV - it's in a transcript of a TV interview with her.

The information provided in the book is very solid, but I would have preferred that it didn't have BOTH kids get injured because of something Hannah does wrong. (That is not realistic! ONE, maybe.) It also would have been a lot more fun to read if the kids' injuries were either less serious or occurred later. The situation is desperate and miserable almost immediately, and just stays that way for the entire book.

Still, there's a lot about the book that's good and there should be an entertaining book that provides earthquake knowledge, so I'm keeping it. But I'm not getting her other book about two girls lost in the woods.
MetaFilter ([syndicated profile] metafilter_feed) wrote2025-08-18 06:17 pm

Thinking about all the lives in our skin

Posted by chavenet

Samuel Pepys, the seventeenth-century English diarist and navyman, had written of sex under chairs and necking on bridges by hiding the saucy accounts in other languages. Eighteenth-century explorer William Byrd II had "rogered" women from London to Virginia in a shorthand code for his secret diaries. In short, William Prestwood's simple substitution cipher isn't remarkable in the history of cryptology. His womanizing barely compares to Byrd's sexual appetite. William is himself a cipher: a nobody in the scheme of history. This is what intrigued Browder. from Cracking the Family Codes [Longreads]
Ask a Manager ([syndicated profile] askamanager_feed) wrote2025-08-18 05:59 pm

the website redesign with pizazz, the explosive gas, and other stories of people overstepping their

Posted by Ask a Manager

Earlier this month, we talked about coworkers overstepping their expertise in disastrous ways. Here are 12 of my favorite stories you shared.

1. The cocktail hour

At a past job, I worked at a substance use treatment center. My boss was planning a fundraising event and was completely floored that his idea of having cocktails at the event was immediately shot down by everyone. He kept saying “I have decades of experience in this and cocktails are the way to go” and leadership continued to push back with a hard no. He was a fundraising expert but was brand new to the recovery industry. Many of our donors were in recovery themselves so it would have been exceptionally poor taste, on top of just being bad optics. Not sure why he never understood that.

2. The punctuation

I used to work in corporate communications. I was helping the IT department set up a new internal site, which featured a gorgeous graphic of all the company’s various platforms. There were only three or four paragraphs of copy, which the team sent me in Word. I lightly edited and approved all the copy.

Imagine my surprise when I logged in a few weeks later and found a solid block of word soup. Every period, comma, and dash had been removed, as had spaces between paragraphs. No words were capitalized, aside from the names of IT platforms. I assumed it’d been some kind of technical error, but when I asked the team member, she told me, “Oh no, I removed the punctuation before we published the page.” Long pause as my brain malfunctioned. “But … why? Why remove punctuation?” “It made it all so cluttered.” Another long pause. “Huh. Well. In this company, we use periods. Punctuation makes sentences easier to read. So could you go ahead and put those back?”

“If you really think it’s better,” she said, somewhat miffed. i do i said i do this is not a %4*& eecummings poem this is a corporate website for the it department for the love of god put the damn periods back where they go

3. The title change

I had a friend change her own title on email and other correspondence from “Manager Assistant” to “Assistant Manager” because she thought it flowed better and meant the same thing. It definitely did not.

4. The command

My very first job out of college was as a computer programmer for a major financial institution. I could write a book about all the stupid and toxic stuff I encountered there, but this particular thing happened in my first week. The team manager (who was supposed to also be a programmer, but I saw no evidence of it during the year I was there) asked me to create a command-line script that could be called with two options. One option would list all the processes running on a specified production machine, and the other would kill all the processes. So I created a script with the options “-list” and “-kill”. The manager said this was too slow and inefficient, and I should change it to “-l” and “-k.” I did that, but added a confirmation prompt, so that if someone typed “-k”, the script would ask if they really wanted to kill all the processes, and they would have to type Y or N in order to continue. The manager said this was also too slow, and demanded that I remove the confirmation prompt. I pointed out that l and k were right next to each other on the keyboard, so it would be way too easy for someone to kill everything by mistake. I also pointed out that the script would be run once a day at most, so taking a few extra seconds to run it would hardly affect anything, while restarting everything after an accidental kill all would take much longer. No matter; everything must run at MAXIMUM SPEED!

So I removed the prompt as instructed, put the script into production, and sent out a group-wide email explaining the new command and warning everyone to be careful and not type k instead of l. Guess what happened less than five minutes later? Go on, guess?

After that, the manager grudgingly allowed me to put the confirmation prompt back in.

5. The article

The owner of a prominent local business won some big industry award and my editors told me to do a story on it (the newsworthiness of it was questionable, but that’s another issue). I reached out to the business owner, who I had done a profile on a year before, and she proceeded to condescendingly school me on how to properly write the story to ensure her many previous honors, talent, and business acumen were included and highlighted. Then she sent me a previous story about her that she said was a prime example of the best journalism she had seen, and I should try to copy that one because unlike me, that reporter was an expert who knew what they were doing.

That previous story was mine. She sent me my own story to tell me I was both an excellent reporter and a rank amateur.

6. The certification application

About six months ago, several Very High Up people at the university where I work received a Very Scary Email from a government agency with the subject line, “Recertification Request Denied.” Cue panicked calls and emails. Several people are immediately called into meetings to investigate what is going on.

Well. The university was indeed in the process of applying for a recertification (think something along the lines of, showing the Department of Education we should be able to continue getting federal financial aid dollars). At the same time, somewhere in an advising office, a well-meaning advisor told a precocious freshman to go set up a profile on a government website (think, making an account on the FAFSA site). Can you see where this is going?

Our dear freshman somehow found the backend government website used only for high-level university administrators and started an application as if he were a university applying for certification. Whenever he encountered questions like, “Who is the chair of the Board of Trustees?” or “Date of incorporation with the State Higher Education Regulatory Agency” (you know, things that would make the average person think, “Maybe I’m on the wrong form”) he conducted research on our university website to find the answers. This must have taken hours.

As it turned out, the email we received from the government said, in essence, that they had received our request from our wayward student, but the request was denied as there was already a well-established university with our name in their system.

7. The website redesign

I was the lead developer on a nonprofit’s website overhaul—clean, accessible, fast. Enter our events coordinator, Dana, who had recently taken one HTML course on YouTube and insisted she should “take a stab” at the homepage.

The next morning, we woke up to an absolute horror show:

1. The hero image was a 12MB TIFF of a cat in sunglasses (because “it’s fun!”).

2. All the navigation links were Comic Sans.

3. The “Donate” button now played an auto-looping MIDI version of “Eye of the Tiger.”

4. Somehow, she had embedded a YouTube video inside another YouTube video.

Oh, and she replaced the accessibility menu with a “sparkle cursor.” When I asked her what happened, she said: “I just wanted to add some ✨pizzazz✨ and I think I fixed the SEO too — I changed all the alt text to just say ‘hot website.’”

We had to roll back the site using an emergency backup, and our IT guy started labeling backups “Before Dana” and “After Dana.”

8. The stolen presentation

I came up with a new procedure that would save the company money. Said procedure was presented to all relevant departments, and all of those department heads approved the new process with one exception. One small department informed us that they just hired a new guy from another division who was a “genius” and he wanted to do a presentation on what he came up with.

The guy started the presentation by telling me “nice try” in front of many, many senior people, and then he proceeded to present my original idea using my original documentation. I requested that the guy zoom in on the bottom of one of the graphics on page 3, where I had typed my name in a very small font. The guy truly did not understand why everyone in the room laughed and walked out of the conference room.

My grandboss went up to the guy, shook his hand and said “Good luck in your future new career, whatever that may be.”

9. The explosive gas

I was responsible for a complex scientific experiment with many parts, involving explosive gas. We were ordered to shut our experiments down to prepare for a possible power failure and to have our supervisors check the experiments to make sure they were shut down properly. I shut it down and went looking for my supervisor. His colleague Jack said he’s not here but offered to do the inspection. I pointed out he doesn’t know anything about it and he brushed me off.

I brought him to the lab and showed him the experiment. He clearly had no idea what he was looking at. He asked me how the experiment worked and what different pieces of equipment did, and I answered.

He then nodded thoughtfully, turned to me, repeated back to me everything I’d just told him, and asked me, “Do you understand?” I was over it so I just said, “Yes, thank you” and he told me he was glad he could help.

And yes, I’m a woman.

10. The suggestion

A few years ago, part of my then-job was a focus on a specific agent process, including writing or revamping some of the procedures, and doing quality reviews of their adherence to said procedures. I did somewhere between 30 and 100 of these reviews a month; all were scored, but in a way where the points didn’t affect the agents’ performance ratings. My boss felt that the scoring had a psychological impact; also, it did give us insight into struggle areas and enable us to provide better and more targeted feedback.

So one day I get an email response to a review, in which the agent condescendingly told me that the procedure in question did not say what I claimed it said. I don’t remember the exact wording of the email, except that his final sentence began, “I suggest you educate yourself.” On a procedure that I wrote.

11. The complex mathematics

Eons ago, I got a job as a data analyst for a small company. The position had been empty for a while and a guy in marketing who was “good with numbers” had been covering it and providing KPIs for the team to use. He gave me printouts of the spreadsheets he’d been using and I didn’t understand anything. I eventually got him to email me the actual files and discovered he’d been using some very creative formulas.

Most egregious examples that have stuck with me for almost two decades:
– For the average, he would sum all values then divide by 2. Not by the number of values. Always by 2. Thus the average of 100, 200, and 300 would be 300.
– To increase a value by 10% he would add +0.10. So if you have an item that costs 200 and increase its price by 10%, the result would be 200.10.

When I pointed out that, respectfully, the numbers were a mess, he told me that mathematics is a very complex subject and I shouldn’t feel bad if I didn’t understand it. I am of course a woman and also my degree is in mathematics. People didn’t like me at that job. They said that since I started all the KPIs had gotten worse (they were just getting the correct numbers instead of marketing guy’s). I think everyone was happy when I got another job a few months later and I quit.

12. The cyberattack

My job suffered a cyberattack. An external email (the sender had a “valid” email) with an attachment and instructions to open said attachment was forwarded from the email account of a coworker – this is the point of infiltration, I think. This forwarded email was sent to approximately half the employees. The coworker with the valid email sent a company-wide email stating, “Don’t open the email with the attachment. It is not from me.”

Another third coworker took the opportunity to email the scammer directly asking, “Is it okay to open the attachment?” Scammer responded, ‘YES!!” The third coworker proceeded to tell the entire agency we could open the attachment. (He has no authority to do so.) Most of the employees who received the forwarded email opened it. The entire company was locked down. The IT department had to reconfigure ALL our computers. I’ve heard the IT department thinks the third employee should be disciplined, but we shall see if they are.

The post the website redesign with pizazz, the explosive gas, and other stories of people overstepping their expertise appeared first on Ask a Manager.

innitmarvelous_og: (Dreams & Mayham Mod)
Amy Innitmarvelous ([personal profile] innitmarvelous_og) wrote in [site community profile] dw_community_promo2025-08-18 01:35 pm

Dreams and Mayhem: Hodge Podge!!!

description

Description:
It's one part dream.
One part disaster.
And absolutely 100% fandom.
It's Your OTPs/Fandoms combined with our chaos.

Schedule: From now until October 12, 2025 when our first challenges closes.

Links:
On Dreamwidth: [personal profile] innitmarvelous_og | Hodge Podge
MetaFilter ([syndicated profile] metafilter_feed) wrote2025-08-18 04:33 pm

Change The Locks

Posted by NoxAeternum

In a revised essay, A. R. Moxon explores tolerance, justice, and their interaction - and why it's important to put the latter over the former.
Ask a Manager ([syndicated profile] askamanager_feed) wrote2025-08-18 04:29 pm

offices are mandating that we all have “fun”

Posted by Ask a Manager

“You’re not leaving yet, are you? Team karaoke starts in 10 minutes!”

Welcome to today’s workplace, where meetings aren’t the only thing getting scheduled: fun — or rather, “fun” — is, too. The occasional happy hour has always been an office staple, but these days, you also might be expected to participate in escape rooms, team skits, themed potlucks, and myriad other activities organized in the name of bonding and camaraderie.

At Slate today, I wrote about how, for many employees, these enforced festivities can feel more like an obligation than a perk. You can read it here.

The post offices are mandating that we all have “fun” appeared first on Ask a Manager.

MetaFilter ([syndicated profile] metafilter_feed) wrote2025-08-18 03:27 pm

"The bathroom WILL be horrific."

Posted by brainwane

A one-minute YouTube Short comedy sketch ("Every College Bar"): a guy who wants to open a college bar goes on to explain that "every time you take a step, your shoe is gonna make a horrendous noise" due to floor stickiness, and discusses other key elements of his vision and business model. Comments on a Bluesky repost include many people reminiscing about the terrible college bars they frequented.
Ask a Manager ([syndicated profile] askamanager_feed) wrote2025-08-18 02:59 pm

can you cheat your way into an interview by calling to “confirm” an interview time that was never sc

Posted by Ask a Manager

A reader writes:

I’m so curious for your thoughts on this. I stumbled across a social media post (somewhere deep in the pools of Reddit) about “hacks” for job searchers. The poster claimed to have gotten multiple interviews for jobs by finding a company advertising a position she was interested in, and emailing or calling the org to “confirm her interview time tomorrow,” then showing up and acting as if she’d been part of the candidate pool all along. According to the poster, she’d gotten many interviews and had even been hired multiple times this way, and only once had the person she got in contact with called BS on her claim to have an appointment.

Am I crazy for thinking this is crazy? I suppose it’s possible that at some, maybe a lot, of large orgs the person at the reception desk would just assume they missed the memo and the person is indeed supposed to be scheduled for an interview. Putting myself in that receptionist’s shoes, I have to imagine that if I got a call from someone claiming to have an interview that I can find no record of, that would raise a red flag, but maybe that’s not realistic. Maybe if the person pulling this trick also submitted their resume, so that if anyone checks the candidate pool they’ll see the name come up and it will seem like the error is on the company’s end?

I’m not saying I’m going to do this or would recommend it to anyone because I think it’s unethical in any case, but on a practical level what do you think? I kind of have to commend the creativity but … if this even worked would you consider that a red flag for the company itself that they didn’t catch the mistake or look further into it? Or am I too attached to processes and maybe this is a great idea?

No, this is bananapants, and I’m really, really skeptical that it would work anywhere except for somewhere extraordinarily disorganized, and maybe not even then.

If a random applicant calls to “confirm” their interview time for the next day, the person who answers the call isn’t just going to be like, “Oh, I don’t see you on our schedule so I better slot you in somewhere, how’s 2 pm?” They’re going to see there’s no record of an interview being scheduled for the person and so they’re going to check with the hiring manager or HR, and that person is going to say, “We never invited this person to interview” (or even, “We haven’t even begun contacting candidates yet, so this person is in fact wearing the pants of a banana”). Then they’re going to come back and tell you, “It looks like there was some kind of mix-up; we don’t have any record that we invited you to interview.”

I suppose it’s possible that if you had the perfect storm of conditions — a disorganized company, bad internal communications, a not-particularly conscientious scheduler — it could work, but good lord that’s basically just screening for the exact sort of company you don’t want to work at once you’re there. And even if you did make it to an interview that way, there’s a very good chance the hiring manager is going to realize they didn’t put you in the to-interview pile and will just go through the motions out of courtesy while not having any real investment in you, unless you somehow manage to blow them away in the interview against all odds, which I am very doubtful will happen if you’re someone who’s resorting to this kind of subterfuge in the first place.

There are a lot of really weird job search “hacks” floating around out there, and they grow in number as people increasingly think the system is stacked against them and see it as an adversarial process that they have to hack their way through. (See also: showing up without an appointment, being intentionally late as a “strategy,” sending the hiring manager chocolate, and on and on.)

They generally don’t succeed, are more likely to harm you than help you, and are largely pushed by people who don’t understand how hiring really works. It’s basically clickbait.

The post can you cheat your way into an interview by calling to “confirm” an interview time that was never scheduled? appeared first on Ask a Manager.

MetaFilter ([syndicated profile] metafilter_feed) wrote2025-08-18 02:02 pm
garryowen: (trek spock prime)
garryowen ([personal profile] garryowen) wrote in [community profile] fancake2025-08-18 09:29 am

Star Trek AOS: you will see what it is to be overcome by magneticwave

Fandom: Star Trek Reboot/AOS
Pairings/Characters: Kirk/Spock
Rating: Teen
Length: 10,103
Creator Links: [archiveofourown.org profile] magneticwave
Theme: Marriage of convenience

Summary: What kind of an idiot would try to explain magic to a Vulcan.

Reccer's Notes: I wouldn't be a good Trek fan if I didn't rec a bonding story for this theme! (I'm going ahead and equating a Vulcan bond with marriage.) Punk actually recced this story six years ago for the magic theme, but it is FANTASTIC for this theme, as well.

As Punk wrote, this is not a Trek/Harry Potter crossover. Rather, facets of the HP universe (magic, legilimency, occlumency) are imported into Trekverse, where Jim comes from a wizarding family. The mental aspects of wizarding are a perfect fit with Vulcan telepathy and bonding. This fic makes excellent use of the commonality.

Much of Trek canon is exactly the same: Jim meets Old Spock in the way he does in canon, but, in this story, a spontaneous bond forms between them. When Old Spock dies (at what seems to be the same time he does in canon), Jim's mind is nearly destroyed by the loss of the bond. He uses his wizarding mind powers to heal the wound somewhat, but he's in danger of dying from the trauma. The logical action to save his life is to have Young Spock bond with him.

What makes this story shine is the writing and characterization. Jim is mouthy, emotionally stunted, in denial, afraid of intimacy, yadda yadda. Spock is repressed, has a huge chip on his shoulder, and is filled with rage and jealousy. It is delicious and vivid and charming. I'm making it sound like this story is all cheek and levity, but it's also emotionally resonant with glimpses of Jim's grief and the depth of his friendship with both Spocks. A+ on so many levels.


Fanwork Links: you will see what it is to be overcome