![[syndicated profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/feed.png)
SGA/SG1: So Good to You by busaikko
Characters/Pairings: John Sheppard/Vala Mal Doran, Cam Mitchell, Rodney McKay, Ronon Dex, Teyla Emmagan
Rating: Teen
Length: 6000
Content Notes: no AO3 warnings apply
Creator Links: busaikko on AO3
Themes: Marriage of Convenience, Teams, Ambiguous relationship, Humor, Friendship
Summary: Rodney had extorted a promise from John to not get recruited into SG-1 while he was on temporary re-assignment to the SGC. As John finished reciting his marriage vows from the crib-sheet Mitchell had handed him, he suspected Rodney would never let him live this down.
Reccer's Notes: With Atlantis stuck in San Francisco, John goes out with SG1 on a mission that needs his gene, but the local Ori-worshipers require those entering the sanctum (where there may be ZPMs) to be married. So John and Vala get hitched, and are able to trade for not one but three ZPMs, which is just as well as later in the story John desperately needs both Vala and the ZPM-power. The story focuses on John and Vala's friendship which develops after their marriage and despite John returning to Pegasus, then later deepens into something more. Cam is initially a dick due to jealousy as he and John had a past fling, but he gets his head out of his ass. The John/Vala relationship is wonderfully written and we're left in the end with it still being an little ambiguous (this is Vala, after all), but definitely hopeful. A lovely read.
Fanwork Links: So Good to You
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
hitting the wall
I need some time not spending up to four days a week writing two columns for no money, columns that are at best depressing.
If I were still at a newspaper doing this, I'd have people who were in the business to bounce ideas off, and some support for the research needed. I am not Robert Reich, who has paid staff. I have me and a computer and occasionally a bookshelf.
And I want to do some lifegiving things for myself, like making more music and creating art and (as long as ICE is not present anywhere near me) going out into the park and breathing the green air of trees. I want to not have the heaviness of the column hanging over my head. I would rather play my flutes, and guitar, and maybe try harp. We have one that belongs to my husband, but he doesn't play often.
And I want to write things like poetry and fiction that don't require me to wear my reductive Inverted-Pyramid-style brain.
So I will notify people, later this week, that it will be more occasional and probably less political.
![[syndicated profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/feed.png)
employees recording conversations, team keeps asking me about my feelings, and more
It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…
1. Employees recording conversations without consent
I used to share an office with a group of other managers. One of them was very disgruntled at the time and, unbeknownst to me, was keeping his phone open and recording all the various conversations happening in the office, I think hoping to catch someone in something he could get them in trouble for. I found out about this and brought it to my manager. I felt that it was an invasion of my privacy and felt pretty violated and annoyed. My manager framed it as, “Well, this is a one-party consent state, so there’s nothing we can do.” It was an extremely demoralizing response and one of many ways in which I felt unsupported by my boss. I didn’t realize until later that “one party” means someone in the conversation needs to be one of those parties. Someone can’t just record two people having a conversation they are not involved in themselves. I wish I would have known that at the time and pushed back more!
Anyway, that was an old job that I have thankfully left. However, a friend of mine is in a very similar situation where her employee has recorded multiple one-on-one conversations with my friend. Since that employee is one of the parties in the conversation, my understanding is that this is legal, but is it also realistic to want to shut this down and discipline the employee? My old boss would not have done that; he said since it was legal, there was nothing he could do. So really, my question is twofold: what would you do about the employee who recorded multiple people talking in an office, and what could my friend do to address her employee recording their conversations?
One-party recording laws refer to whether it’s illegal to record someone without their knowledge or consent. It has nothing to do with whether an employer can choose to have policies against surreptitious recording in their own office! An employer absolutely could prohibit that and discipline or fire someone for it, regardless of whether they’re in a one-party-consent state or not. Your manager was being ridiculous and was wrong when he said there was nothing they could do.
As for your friend, at a minimum she needs to tell the employee that she’s not permitted to record in their office without the consent of the people being recorded (or of management, or whatever makes sense for the situation). She also should figure out why the employee was recording her: does the employee feel the manager is saying one thing but then doing another, harassing her, or otherwise engaging in some form of misconduct? Or is it a purely adversarial move? Either way, your friend can prohibit the recording, but figuring out what’s behind it is important to figuring out whether something more than that needs to be done.
2. My team keeps asking me about my feelings
I would love some advice on how to deal with my new “touchy-feely” work group. In the past few months, my immediate team of three people was moved from Division #1 to Division #2. I actually like most of the people I’ll be working with in Division #2 on an individual basis, but the problem is that the division as a whole has a very “touchy-feely” culture that is making me uncomfortable. The thing I’m most uncomfortable with right now is that they start every meeting by asking everyone how they feel that day, and anyone who indicates they’re feeling less than “good” that day is asked if they want to talk about it. As someone who suffers from anxiety and depression (and is in a profession that is being seriously negatively affected by the current administration), I hate this. I don’t want to share my feelings at work, especially in a meeting of 6+ people.
The problem is exacerbated because everyone else almost always indicates that they are feeling “good” at the beginning of every meeting. I’m usually the only one who indicates that I’m feeling “neutral” or “bad.” I feel singled out, and I also feel like I’m going crazy because apparently everyone else is having a great day, even though our profession is going up in flames!
Should I just pretend like I’m feeling “good” at every meeting, or is there a way to get them to stop asking about my feelings all the time?
Yeah, if you say you’re feeling “bad,” it’s virtually guaranteed that any halfway considerate person is going to ask more about it, out of basic politeness if nothing else. The very easy way to solve this is to say you’re “good.” You’re not obligated to provide an honest answer about how you’re feeling if it’s not something you want to get into. (In fact, I’d argue that even if you did want to talk about it, a team meeting wouldn’t necessarily be the place for it anyway.)
So from here onward, your answer is always that you’re “pretty good” or “good” or “doing well” or so forth, and that solves the problem.
I do think it’s probably notable that you’ve felt compelled to answer honestly despite hating it, and it would be interesting to know if you’re overlooking other situations where bland niceties are permissible and would make your life easier!
3. My manager frequently mistypes words
My manager very frequently misspells words, names, and acronyms, or flip flops words in a sentence. For example, he might spell Robert as “Robret” or DHS as “DSH.” Typically there is at least one incorrect spelling per day in his emails. I think it makes our team look unprofessional, but readers can typically still understand the meaning of the email with the incorrect elements. Sometimes, this adds more work for me, because I have to review edits he makes to my documents with a fine-toothed comb. I have a hunch he may be dyslexic or have a similar disability, but he has never shared anything about that with me. Is there anything I can do here to improve the situation?
If you’re good at proofreading and like doing it, you can let him know you like to proofread and are always happy to proof things before they’re sent out, but otherwise no. (And if we’re mostly talking about internal emails, it’s unlikely to be a big deal, assuming your company didn’t hire him as, you know, a proofreader.)
If you were his manager, you could suggest he turn on spellcheck and read things over more carefully, but as his employee it’s not really yours to fix.
For the edits he makes to your work, though, a lot of programs have a Compare Documents function where you can compare two versions of the document and easily see what changed.
Related:
are senior execs too busy for spelling and grammar?
4. LinkedIn is watering down its hate speech policy
Just read this article about LinkedIn removing protections for trans people from their terms of service and wondered if it sparked any thoughts about LinkedIn, or whether your readers might want to know about this if they didn’t spot an article about it.
For people who didn’t click: LinkedIn’s “Hateful and Derogatory Content” page used to include language prohibiting the “misgendering or deadnaming of transgender individuals.” Sometime recently, they quietly deleted it. They also edited their “Harassment and Abusive Content” section to remove “race or gender identity” from what comments targeting others will fall under their hate speech rules.
Yeah, it sparks some thoughts about LinkedIn, and those thoughts are that actively going out of your way to roll back protections on marginalized groups is a real shit move.
5. Including things from elementary school on a resume
My son is a rising college senior. He has been in a pre-health-professions major until this summer but decided that he does not want to continue in that direction (grad school and such). But the demands of the track he’s been on, including requirements for trainings and certifications, job shadowing, and so on mean that his resume is very thin in the work history area. He’s got a job now and so he has a year to improve that aspect, and we can package the trainings and field experiences to show, more or less, that he is trainable and maybe has some skills relevant to what he might want to do. But it’s still a short resume, mostly summer service jobs before this year, and he is applying now for a position that would start after his graduation that requires he submit a current resume.
His dad is recommending that he include some volunteer activities he did a few times in elementary school (“shows he is a good person”) and a national athletic title he won in eighth grade (“shows dedication”). I feel like the risk of having it come out that these were childhood experiences isn’t worth it. I see that you didn’t make strong recommendations about including or omitting hobbies on resumes, and recommended including volunteer activity only it it is relevant. In this situation, balancing the fear of presenting a thin resume with the worry about the filler being quite outdated information, what would you tell him to do?
He 100% should not include anything from elementary school or the eighth grade. It’s just not done on resumes. Work experience from high school, maybe in some cases. But before that, no — and definitely not as far back as elementary school. It would make his judgment look really off and cast him in a childish light.
A short resume with mostly summer jobs is fine for a current college student!
Related:
what to put on a resume when you have zero work experience
The post employees recording conversations, team keeps asking me about my feelings, and more appeared first on Ask a Manager.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Twinkle: PMD: Destruction Call x Cassette Beasts: Art: barkley under the stars
Rating: G/General
Artist notes: i have no idea how to tag cbcs/dekudogs sorry if im not doin it right lol
Content notes: it's a gif! also this is an au of barkley where instead of getting isekai'd into new wirral he ended up in the pmd: dc universe as one of the local fakemon (a laelapis specifically, he's also a delta pokemon, too.) lol
Summary: barkley under the stars!!!
( nice night under the stars... )
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
2538 / Fic - The Old Guard
The Old Guard | ~7500 words | Joe/Nicky, Andy/Quynh, past Nicky/Quỳnh, AU | Thanks to
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(Also on AO3)
( Maybe their marriage wasn't working because Quỳnh was a lesbian; maybe it also wasn't working because Nicky was gay. )
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Dear Rarepair creator
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
thank you so much for writing a story or creating art for me! I'll be absolutely thrilled about anything you can create about the relationships I requested, and everything important is in the requests themselves, but if you'd like even more info, general likes etc., here you go,
My AO3 account is
General Preferences
( Likes & Dislikes/DNWs )
Fandoms and relationships
In somewhat alphabetical order - note that some sections are expanded compared to the sign-up form:
Jump directly to:
- 绅探 | Detective L: Huo Wensi/Luo Fei
- Grimm: Nick/Renard/Juliette
- 镇魂 | Guardian (TV): Ya Qing/Zhu Hong
- Grimm/镇魂 | Guardian (TV) crossover: Renard/Ya Qing
- Legend of the Seeker: Cara/Darken Rahl
- Once Upon a Time in Wonderland: Anastasia/Jabberwocky
- Time Engraver crossovers: Time Engraver/Zhao Yunlan, Time Engraver/Jiang Yang
- 长公主在上 | Eldest Princess On Top: Li Yunzhen/Gu Xuanqing
( 绅探 | Detective L: Huo Wensi/Luo Fei )
( Grimm: Nick Burkhardt/Sean Renard/Juliette Silverton )
( 镇魂 | Guardian (TV): Ya Qing/Zhu Hong )
( Grimm/Guardian crossover: Renard/Ya Qing )
( Legend of the Seeker: Cara/Darken Rahl )
( Once Upon a Time in Wonderland: Anastasia/Jabberwocky )
( Time Engraver Crossovers: Time Engraver/Zhao Yunlan, Time Engraver/Jiang Yang )
( 长公主在上 | Eldest Princess On Top: Li Yunzhen/Gu Xuanqing )
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Review: The Death and Life of River Song: The Dissolution of Time
But in short this audio drama finds River teaming up with a seven foot panther-like alien trying to stop a time disturbance in Tudor England. And even that's not a straightforward look at the audio. (Dust was described in Big Finish's magazine Vortex, issue 197, so I'm not considering that a spoiler.)
( Read more... )
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Harry Potter: A Convenient Arrangement by CatsAreCool (Rachel500) (TrekCat)
Fandom: Harry Potter
Pairings: Hermione/Harry
Characters: Hermione, Harry, Hermione's father and mother, Harry's mother, other canon characters
Rating: Teen
Length: 31,500 words
Creator Links: CatsAreCool / Rachel500 / TrekCat
Theme: Marriage of convenience, AU: Fork in the road, Working together
Summary: Lady Hermione Granger needs to get married in order to secure her inheritance and everybody agrees that the best candidate to help her is the Earl of Gryffindor, Defeater of the Dark Lord Voldemort, Harry Potter.
There's just one problem: they're not friends and Hermione may have once told him, thanks to some meddling Weasleys, that she'd never get involved with him.
Reccer's Notes: Excellent story. AU - Hermione never cared much for Harry, but when she's required to marry, he's the logical choice. I love how they discuss it like adults, reach a mutual agreement, and then find themselves gradually falling for each other. And all of this adult attraction goodness is nicely interwoven with an intriguing mystery. It's a well-told story with a thoroughly satisfying ending.
Content Notes: Canon-typical violence including attempted murder via spells, mention of old-fashioned patriarchal approaches to women including conc.ept of ownership and arranged marriages, use of love potions. Mildly anti-Dumbledore, anti-Ron and Ginny Weasley
Fanwork Links: A Convenient Arrangement by TrekCat at AO3
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Next-gen Fruits Basket fans
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Now that they're all finished (on the anime front),
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Jumping ahead a bit: you may notice the absence of the manga in the above, which has now been resolved! I initially had been like, "Well, I have a lending set, and its day has come!", but by the time the visit actually happened and I'd unearthed said set (a combination of the five 2-in-1 hardcover volumes Tokyopop managed to release, and the rest of the series in the standard Tokyopop edition), I'd talked sense into myself and decided to make it a gift instead. I'm not actually sure the lending set had ever gone out of the house (other than
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Anyway! Seeing the three of them was lovely. ( cut! )
![[syndicated profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/feed.png)
my coworker starts every question with tediously long rambling and apologies
A reader writes:
I have a new coworker, Lee, who is driving me nuts. I am not their manager, but I lead our work team and am responsible for us meeting our goals. (I have been a people manager before but am not one now.)
Our team is basically the final QA check before a specific type of project can proceed — before the work can move forward, it needs a series of approvals, and we manage the approvals process (although we, as a team, do not grant the approvals). Many people in the company might only do this once during their entire tenure, so they are often unfamiliar with the process. If they don’t get the correct approvals, not only will their work be yanked later on in the process (potentially very publicly), but their manager and even director might need to get involved.
Lee came from a role where they didn’t have as much compliance involvement, so this is a role change for them.
What’s driving me bonkers is Lee’s conversational style. We hold regular office hours with the people going through this QA process to answer their questions about the process and direct them to next steps, and Lee is joining these meetings with me to learn the process. A lot of the process is situation-dependent and our documentation is lacking, so this is a key part of Lee’s training.
In these meetings, whenever they have a question, there is a long, rambling, self-deprecating and sometimes weirdly obsequious preamble,
such as, “Well this may be a naive question and you of course know what you’re doing much better than I do, and my experience is related but not exactly relevant, and y’all are doing SO SO GREAT with this project, it’s really good, but…” and on and on.This is not an exaggeration. Every statement, question, or comment comes with multiple caveats, apologies, disclaimers, or weirdly interjected praise.
I guess my question is: how do I cut off this rambling in the meetings? These support sessions are usually only 30 minutes and we have a limited number of them available, so the people coming to us for guidance don’t have much time to get help. If Lee goes off on a tangent, I can do the “I’d like to make sure we have time to answer the attendees’ questions” redirect, but I’m stumped about how to say, “Please stop apologizing for existing and buttering them up and JUST GET TO THE POINT” when it’s both in progress and in front of people who don’t know my coworker or me.
Our team is very small and if I don’t train my Lee to do these meetings, I will be on the hook for nearly all of them (our other coworkers are in wildly different time zones so many of them are out of their working hours).
Lee speaks in a similar way in meetings with just me and I have taken to cutting them off in a way that I am worried seems rude. “No, no such thing as a naive question, you’re still learning.” “No, no need to apologize for being new to this, let’s just go over the topics for today.” “Thanks, but I don’t feel like what I did was especially amazing, this is just my job.” I don’t feel like this would be appropriate to do in the help meetings because we’re usually meeting the attendees for the first (and often only!) time, and because Lee isn’t speaking to me when they are rambling.
I’ve already had one conversation (with written backup) with Lee about conciseness in written communication, using standard English (we work with people all over the world so we try to minimize regionalisms to avoid confusion), and not over-apologizing in the emails we send. This conversation brought them to tears, because (as they told me) they are also neurodivergent and have a strong reaction to criticism, which I understand. I had our manager’s support before holding that conversation.
Otherwise they are a great coworker — very helpful, get their work done, and we get along fine. But I’m worried this verbal tic is close to sending me into BEC mode. :(
Can you suggest anything else for me to do? I am stumped because this seems like a very ingrained habit for them and I don’t know if it’s even possible for them to change.
It might not be possible for Lee to change, but there are a few things that could help.
First, does Lee have to speak in the meetings you’re doing jointly? If they’re there to learn the process, isn’t there an argument for them holding their questions for later so that the people in attendance have time to get their own questions answered?
If Lee eventually will need to lead these meetings on their own, this doesn’t solve the bigger problem but it could go a long way toward making these particular meetings more manageable.
Beyond that, though, either you or your manager needs to give Lee some pretty direct feedback about communication style. You mentioned that your boss is aware of the issues — but is she aware of their severity and the impact they’re having? If you haven’t already laid out the full impact Lee’s communication style is having, do that. She needs to know so that she can do her own job, which includes giving Lee feedback and hopefully coaching them to communicate in a way that will mesh better with the work.
But I also think you can be pretty direct with Lee yourself! For example: “I don’t know if you realize, but you often give multiple caveats and apologies before you ask a question. It’s slowing us down and making it harder to get through everything we need to cover. I know it might be an ingrained habit, but can you work on just starting with the question you want to ask? It’ll help us move faster.” This is a one-on-one conversation, obviously; don’t do it in a meeting with others. But the next time it happens while you’re talking one-on-one, name the pattern and ask them directly to work on stopping.
If you’re concerned they’ll get upset at hearing that, like they did when you talked with them about written communication … that’s okay! Obviously we’d prefer that people not get upset by things we have to convey at work, but the fear of upsetting someone (even the likelihood of them getting upset) can’t be a reason that you don’t say the thing that needs to be said. If they’re upset, they’ll need to work through that — but your part of this is to name what needs to change. Say it kindly, of course, but not saying it at all would actually be less kind … because if Lee doesn’t get this feedback, they’re going to go through their career putting off anyone they need to work with regularly. It’s far kinder to name the problem and let them know they need to work on it.
That doesn’t mean Lee can stop. What you’re describing — the excessive apologies and praise combined with a disproportionate reaction to even mild criticism — is something that can be deeply-rooted in a person’s psychology, and isn’t always easy to change. But Lee definitely won’t change it if no one tells them they need to … and it’s showing up at work in ways that give you standing to raise it, both with them and with your boss.
The post my coworker starts every question with tediously long rambling and apologies appeared first on Ask a Manager.