Oh, huh! Okay, that's odd. And completely frustrating, argh.
If you're at the point of "it's done and gone" and moving on (which, I know that place, and it is a good place to be!), ignore the rest of this; but if you do want more eyes on it, we can either try poking at your uncompressed .mov to see if we can smooth it out somehow, or you can email me your export/compressor settings and I can compare them to what I used last year, see if there's something that might be causing it.
And man, seriously -- the further we advance, the more places there are for complications! At least capturing off tapes, everything was in the same size, even if the quality was fuzzy. Now there's artifacting and compression and different sizes from different sources...
But hey, at least this year S and I finally learned how to work off ripped source, which we have been utterly unable to do for years now. Lookit us, rocking the 2004 tech skills! \o/ *g*
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2012-06-30 11:08 pm (UTC)Oh, huh! Okay, that's odd. And completely frustrating, argh.
If you're at the point of "it's done and gone" and moving on (which, I know that place, and it is a good place to be!), ignore the rest of this; but if you do want more eyes on it, we can either try poking at your uncompressed .mov to see if we can smooth it out somehow, or you can email me your export/compressor settings and I can compare them to what I used last year, see if there's something that might be causing it.
And man, seriously -- the further we advance, the more places there are for complications! At least capturing off tapes, everything was in the same size, even if the quality was fuzzy. Now there's artifacting and compression and different sizes from different sources...
But hey, at least this year S and I finally learned how to work off ripped source, which we have been utterly unable to do for years now. Lookit us, rocking the 2004 tech skills! \o/ *g*