[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

A reader writes:

I am a woman in my 30s and I work with the public at a senior center. I do my best to maintain a friendly but professional presence with the center’s guests. Sometimes guests surprise me with a hug. I don’t hug back and try to step away quickly when they let me go, but I don’t make a big deal of it or say anything.

It’s men and women alike, usually in their 70s, 80s, or 90s, and nobody seems to be creepy or gropey about it. I try to be empathetic; some of the folks who hug me are very lonely, with not many close family members. In some cases, they might have a condition that can affect their judgment of what is appropriate. I am happy to be a good listener and point to the resources and activities that are available at the senior center. But regardless of the guest’s situation, I don’t think it’s my job to accept unwelcome touch.

I don’t want to come down too hard on a lonely, friendly person, and I don’t like to think of myself as frigid or unwelcoming. But, I need to reinforce my personal/professional space bubble. Do you have a script or any advice for this situation?

“Oh, I’m not a hugger but it’s so nice to see you!” Or “I’m not a hugger but I’m so glad for the chance to talk to you” or whatever makes sense for the situation — basically “I’m not a hugger” followed immediately by something positive to demonstrate warmth in a different way.

That said, the reality of this job is that you may get some people who want to override your preferences and insist on hugging you anyway, because generational norms on unwanted touch have really changed over the years and not everyone has realized that, and particularly when you’re dealing with people with cognitive issues.

Related:
hugging at work: okay or not okay?

The post how can I fend off unwanted hugs at work? appeared first on Ask a Manager.

Graham Greene has left the building

Sep. 2nd, 2025 05:18 pm
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by Windopaene

A great actor has passed Graham Green has passed. An amazing a Canadian First Nations (Oneida) actor has passed.

He did a lot of great work. Thunderheart Is where i fell in love with him...

"Think you were looking for Mt. Rushmore? You got off the wrong exit on the interstate."

And a ton of other great performances.

.

Confessions of the Working Poor

Sep. 2nd, 2025 04:34 pm
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by Kitteh

I work hard, buy quality clothes and fake my way through dinner-party conversations. I'm also part of a fast-growing Canadian underclass.

Even in Canada, where we have at least something of a better safety net than the US, rents are out of control, the COL is skyhigh, and we're all just trying to get by, it's still not enough. It's considerably harder if you aren't a white Canadian. I posted this because I know quite a few folks with these sorts of precarious cobbled-together jobs. It's not a race to see who has it the worst; it's a snapshot of one person's life.
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by cortex

Take two cubes, equal in size. Grab a knife and carve a square-shaped hole through one of the cubes, leaving it structurally intact, and shove the other cube through it. Can it be done? Prince Rupert of Rhine (allegedly) bet as much and won. And so any shape that can allow a copy of itself through a hole in itself is said to have the Rupert property, or simply to "be Rupert". Many famous polyhedra (your Platonic, Archimedean, Catalan, even Johnson solids) are Rupert, and it's been conjectured that all convex polyhedra are. But no: behold, the Noperthedron.

The process of chasing down Rupertness has played out over several hundred years; the story of Prince Rupert came from John Wallis, an English mathematician and 17th C. contemporary of Rupert who may or may not have just been looking for an excuse to show off his simple and elegant solution: a cube pushing, aligned face-first, through another cube aligned along opposite vertices. A square inside a hexagon, essentially. About a century later, Dutch mathematician Pieter Nieuwland produced an improved solution where, by coming at the one cube form a specific off-kilter angle, another cube even larger than the first could fit through. This larger cube could be ~1.06 times the size the original cube and still fit through. From this, the name "Nieuwland number" came to represent the maximum scaling factor for a Rupert polyhedron, and it varies from one to the next. Much of the ensuing 230 years or so of progress working out Rupertness and best-known Nieuwland numbers for various polyhedra is summed up (in between a lot of math) in bits and pieces in the 2023 paper An algorithmic approach to Ruperts problem. One of the things that paper notes is that of the known famous symmetric polyhedra, one Archimedean solid in particular, the Rhombicosidodecahedron, seems very plausibly to not be Rupert. They do not find a proof of this, but the statistical analysis is compelling and threatened the long-standing conjecture that all convex polyhedra are Rupert. In that context, the Noperthedron (is it Rupert? Nopert!) was born; a convex polyhedron that is explicitly, provably not Rupert. Though you can still put a smaller hole in it and us it to store pens something.
[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

With layoffs in the U.S. surging (in July, they reached their highest level since the early months of the pandemic), you might be wondering if you’d receive severance pay if it happened to you. If you do get laid off, ideally that wouldn’t be the first time you think about severance pay; you want to go into any negotiation about pay already armed with some basic facts.

At The Cut today, I’ve rounded up some common questions and answers about severance pay and how to get it. You can read it here.

The post how does severance pay work when you’re laid off or fired? appeared first on Ask a Manager.

[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

A reader writes:

I’ve been with my company for about three years and in my current department for two. In March, I moved to a new position in my same department after my previous supervisor said I was one of his best performers.

But then I got really sick and other things went wrong (such as my spouse having a car accident), and I ended up getting really, really behind. It didn’t help that my doctor refused to fill out FMLA paperwork because he hates paperwork.

Ever since then, I feel like everything that can go wrong has, but all my new supervisor can see is me making excuses for why I’m not caught up yet. She’s repeatedly told me that this is not the performance she expected from me, but I am literally fighting tooth and nail to get caught up. I’ve taking to using energy drinks and nicotine pouches every day to force myself to stay awake, and working the rest of the time to get my work done. I’m not even spending time with my family, and I am constantly stressed to the point of tears because I am so frazzled and so scared of losing my job.

She has gone from being really sweet and kind (telling me to feel better if I have a migraine) to rather cold and short (one-word answers or a thumbs-up). I’m terrified I’m going to lose my job at a company I love, but I also have no idea how to recover this relationship once I’m back where I need to be (and hopefully ahead like I usually was).

I already have a sincere apology planned when I am back in line, but what else should I do? How can I recover this relationship?

First, can you talk to your old supervisor about what’s been going on and share your concerns with him? Let him know you’ve had this perfect storm of crises in your personal life, it’s affected your work, and you’ve been working as hard as you can to get caught up but you get the sense that your new manager is really unhappy with you, and ask for his advice. The ideal outcome to that conversation would be that your old supervisor could talk to your new one, assure her that what’s been going on isn’t typical and is due to external events outside your control, and that if she can give you some grace to get through this period, she’s likely to be really happy with your work. In fact, if he doesn’t offer that, you could explicitly ask if he’d be willing to do that.

Second, talk to your new manager yourself. You said you’re planning to do that once everything is more under control, but you should do it right away — because the sooner you try to reframe things for her, the better. Say that you’ve had multiple things go wrong outside of work, you’re dismayed by how it’s affected your job, and you have been working as hard as you can to get everything under control, and ask for some grace to get through this period. You can even say something like, “I think if you talk to OldManager, he’ll tell you this isn’t typical for me at all.”

Ideally, you’d also ask for her help in figuring out a more realistic approach to getting things back on track. Yes, it’s important to get caught up, but only within reasonable human limits; it shouldn’t mean needing nicotine patches, not seeing your family, or always being stressed to the verge of tears (and that approach is likely to backfire at some point anyway because you’re not going to be in the right state to do strong work). A good manager would look at what’s happened, see where you are and what still needs to be done, and work with you to come up with a plan to get caught up without coming at the expense of your mental or physical health.

Caveat: that’s what a good manager would do. I don’t know whether yours falls in that category or not. It’s true that this is harder for both of you because you’re new (which means there’s no existing bank of capital and credibility that would be built up if you had worked for her for longer before this all happened), but her being short and cold and telling you repeatedly that this isn’t the work she expected from you (without offering any support, it sounds like?) … aren’t great marks in her favor. So part of me also wonders if returning to your previous supervisor is an option, if a candid conversation like the one I described above doesn’t help things.

The post how do I repair my relationship with my new manager after a series of personal crises? appeared first on Ask a Manager.

[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by AlSweigart

Coder, journalist, and author of Hacks, Leaks, and Revelations Micah Lee writes about Joshua Aaron's HOPE conference talk on ICEBlock, his iPhone app that allows users to anonymously report ICE sightings within a 5 mile radius, and to get notifications when others report ICE sightings near them. You can see the full talk, and the lively/infuriating Q&A, here, starting at 6:12:10. But unfortunately, despite the app's goal of protecting people from ICE, its viral success, and the state repression against it, ICEBlock has serious issues. Most importantly, it wasn't developed with input from people who actually defend immigrants from deportation. As a result, it doesn't provide people with what they need to stay safe.

oasis' glitch

Sep. 2nd, 2025 10:33 am
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by HearHere

uniquely "human" — what the hell else could it be? But after decades of music chosen by algorithm, of the spirit of listen-together radio fracturing into a million personalized streams, of social media and the politics that fuel it ordering acts into groups of the allowed and prohibited, of autotuning and overdubbing washing out raw instruments, of our current cultural era's spell of phone-zombification, of the communal spaces of record stores disbanded as a mainstream notion of gathering, well, it's not such a given anymore. Thousands of people convening under the sky to hear a few talented fellow humans break their backs with a bunch of instruments, that oldest of entertainment constructs, now also feels like a radical one [hollywoodreporter] (previously)
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by chavenet

It strikes me as perfectly reasonable—obligatory, even, from a journalistic standpoint, through which I am so wont to launder my addiction to carousing—to drive six hours just to visit some weird bar. And with some research, it was clear that the Pinehurst was indeed vibrating on a whole different frequency. "There are dive bars so densely packed with visual, historical, rational, and emotional stimuli that boiling the experience down to a few paragraphs feels impossible. Pinehurst Inn Bar & Grill in Indian River, Michigan fits every bit of that description," wrote a review on Scoundrel's Field Guide, a trusty compendium of great American dive bars. "It's a pizza place, it's a hotel, it's a boat dock, it's a dive bar, it's a dance floor, it's small town, it's ramshackle, it's so many things that it's tempting to stop writing because words won't do the place justice." from Up in Northern Michigan's Lynchian underbelly [SCARY COOL SAD GOODBYE]
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by kliuless

When the government can see everything: How one company—Palantir—is mapping the nation's data - "Government agencies are contracting with Palantir to correlate disparate pieces of data, promising efficiency but raising civil liberties concerns."[1,2,3]

Gotham is an investigative platform built for police, national security agencies, public health departments and other state clients. Its purpose is deceptively simple: take whatever data an agency already has, break it down into its smallest components and then connect the dots. Gotham is not simply a database. It takes fragmented data, scattered across various agencies and stored in different formats, and transforms it into a unified, searchable web. The stakes are high with Palantir's Gotham platform. The software enables law enforcement and government analysts to connect vast, disparate datasets, build intelligence profiles and search for individuals based on characteristics as granular as a tattoo or an immigration status. It transforms historically static records – think department of motor vehicles files, police reports and subpoenaed social media data like location history and private messages – into a fluid web of intelligence and surveillance. These departments and agencies use Palantir's platform to assemble detailed profiles of individuals, mapping their social networks, tracking their movements, identifying their physical characteristics and reviewing their criminal history. This can involve mapping a suspected gang member's network using arrest logs and license plate reader data, or flagging individuals in a specific region with a particular immigration status. The efficiency the platform enables is undeniable. For investigators, what once required weeks of cross-checking siloed systems can now be done in hours or less. But by scaling up the government's investigative capacity, Gotham also alters the relationship between the state and the people it governs... These integrations mean that Palantir is not just a vendor of software; it is becoming a partner in how the federal government organizes and acts on information. That creates a kind of dependency. The same private company helps define how investigations are conducted, how targets are prioritized, how algorithms work and how decisions are justified. Because Gotham is proprietary, the public, and even elected officials, cannot see how its algorithms weigh certain data points or why they highlight certain connections. Yet, the conclusions it generates can have life-altering consequences: inclusion on a deportation list or identification as a security risk. The opacity makes democratic oversight difficult, and the system's broad scope and wide deployment means that mistakes or biases can scale up rapidly to affect many people.
-Palantir: Peter Thiel's Data-Mining Firm Helps DOGE Build Master Database to Surveil, Track Immigrants -"Purge Palantir": Day of Action Protests Firm's Role in Gov't Surveillance, ICE & Genocide in Gaza -Palantir and the Surveillance State w/ Alice Hu from Planet over Profit also btw...
  • Behind the Curtain: The Great Fusing - "America's government and technology giants are fusing into a codependent superstructure in a race to dominate AI and space for the next generation. The merging of Washington and Silicon Valley is driven by necessity — and fierce urgency. The U.S. government needs AI expertise and dominance to beat China to the next big technological and geopolitical shift — but can't pull this off without the help of Microsoft, Google, OpenAI, Nvidia and many others."[4,5]
  • Silicon Valley Enlists in the Business of War - "In a major shift, Google, OpenAI, Meta and venture capitalists — many of whom had once forsworn involvement in war — have embraced the military industrial complex."
[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. HR says our horrible coworker is “unfireable”

My coworker was hired just over a year ago, and since then he has managed to piss off and/or alienate every single person in our department. He is rude and dismissive, especially toward his female colleagues (honestly, his behavior smacks of misogyny). He went to HR about a conversation on Teams, and the resulting investigation ended with our department director being reprimanded, which was completely ridiculous. Things have only gotten worse; just yesterday he tried to accuse other people on the team of not doing their jobs, and in the process said something to me that was way out of line.

I am considering going to HR, but there are two problems: he sued a previous employer for wrongful termination, so we know he’s litigious, and he apparently has some sort of disability; these two things, according to our HR department, essentially make him un-fireable. This situation is unsustainable and I have no idea where to turn at this point. We can’t all quit.

If your HR department really thinks he’s unfireable, they’re incompetent. People with disabilities aren’t unfireable; employers just need to be able to show that the reason the person was fired wasn’t because of the disability. That would require HR to do their job and ensure that this guy is given clear feedback, time to improve, and warnings about the consequences if he doesn’t, and that they document all those conversations and exactly what the problems were. They either don’t want to bother doing that, which would be negligent of them, or they don’t understand the basics of employment law enough to be in their jobs. Either way, they suck.

As for what you can do, your and your coworkers should keep bringing the problems to your manager and to HR. Make it more of a pain for them to ignore you all than to it is to ignore the problems with your coworker, and it’s possible (although not guaranteed) that you could eventually get traction.

2. My employee is getting credit for work I had to completely redo

I have a fairly new (not yet a year) employee who was hired, in part, to do some basic design and layout work. She recently embarked on her first bigger project, and when I reviewed the drafts, I ended up completely redoing them because they weren’t up to par with what we would typically produce. I sent them over to her, and she sent them along.

The team that received the designs is now emailing both of us to share what an amazing job she did, how she exceeded expectations, they’re so beautiful, etc. It’s clear that she didn’t note then or now how the files were built. It’s not necessarily about the credit — I recognize that I get compensated in other ways and it’s more important that credit, like gifts, flow downward. Yet, the lack of acknowledgement still bothers me — it feels dishonest, somehow. I try to always give credit where credit is due to the team, collaborators, even freelance vendor partners.

I’m trying to let it go but each new email sets off another wave of discomfort. Is this a red flag or am I being overly sensitive about meaningless “credit”? Does being the boss in this situation mean that I just should be pleased that a stakeholder is happy with the work that got done? She’s struggling in other ways so that may also be coloring my perception in this situation.

I don’t think it’s a problem that the other team is crediting her, but I’m curious about whether she realizes that you completely redid the work — less because she shouldn’t be accepting credit for work she didn’t do and more because she’s much less likely to learn and improve if she doesn’t pay attention to the changes you made and why. And if she didn’t pay attention to that and now she’s hearing glowing praise, that’s going to make it harder for you to coach her.

So: did you highlight to her the changes you made and is she aware that you ended up completely redoing the work? If not, that’s something you should do differently in the future, since she won’t learn otherwise. If you did do that and she knows the final work was a lot more yours than hers, it’s possible she’s not saying anything in response to the other team’s praise because she feels awkward about it. But the question of what you’ve ensured she knows is a lot more important than what the team receiving the work knows.

3. Will I be fired for saying a coworker wasn’t choosing their battles well?

Last year, I said to someone that a coworker’s unexpected rudeness felt like they weren’t choosing their fights very efficiently. I was light-hearted and meant it more about how some people don’t choose their battles well. Well, one year later, it turns out some ex-coworkers overheard this and told HR I threatened to fight this person. I actually didn’t even remember saying it until I was contacted asking if I threatened violence to my coworker.

I will be more careful about the type of language I use at work in the future, but is this something the average person would get fired for if no prior complaints exist? I denied that I’d ever threaten a coworker and said that this feels very out of character for me, and I’m happy to cooperate with an investigation to confirm it. I understand if I end up with a warning, but my coworkers reporting this as violence really feels like a stretch when this isn’t an uncommon phrase. I’ve never raised my voice or yelled or been aggressive at work at all. I distanced myself from those three coworkers because I wanted to keep things professional, and suspect this is retaliation for that decision. I’ve never been an investigation subject, and my performance reviews assert my professionalism.

Any advice on how to calmly defend myself and/or perspective on if you’d fire an employee for this sort of thing would be appreciated. I’m probably overthinking it but I’m honestly really disheartened that my coworkers would go after my livelihood over a misunderstanding from over a year ago.

It’s extraordinarily unlikely that you’ll be fired over this. Your company has to investigate it because of what they were told, but you can simply explain: you used the very, very common phrase “choose their battles” and it had nothing to do with violence or threats. You can also tell HR that you suspect the report may be retaliation after you distanced yourself from the colleagues who reported it. Assuming you’re known to be reasonably level-headed (and it sounds like you are) and your manager and others know this would be out of character for you, it isn’t likely to turn into a big deal.

4. My employer says we don’t need to pay unauthorized overtime

I just had an argument with my boss (director level) and our payroll manager about paying employees overtime. There was recently a directive that “overtime is not approved.” I completely understand that and notified my team that they should arrive and depart at their scheduled times and take their lunch breaks.

My hourly employees are scheduled to work an eight-hour day. Their schedule is built into our timekeeping software. If someone clocks in early or late, I have to approve the punch in order for them to be paid for the extra time (or to acknowledge that they were late). The problem is that if, for example, someone clocks in five minutes early or leaves 10 minutes late even a couple times a week, that puts them in to overtime. My boss and payroll manager don’t want me to approve these punches, which would result in the employee not getting paid for the overtime they work. My understanding of the law is that they must be paid. The Department of Labor website specifically says that if someone stays late to finish up a project, that time must be paid. But my payroll manager says that because we said overtime wasn’t approved, then it’s on the employee to not work overtime and we aren’t going to pay it. My boss told me that I’m “the only one” who does this. “No one else” approves punches that don’t align with their employees’ schedules.

I’m not comfortable not paying hourly employees for all the time they work. I know the solution is to make sure my employees are not going over 40 hours per week, even by a few minutes. But I feel gaslit and could use some reassurance that an employer can’t just choose to not pay overtime when someone has earned it.

There’s not even a little bit of grey here. The law is very, very clear: employers must pay non-exempt employees for all time they work, even unapproved overtime. They can discipline them for working unapproved overtime, or even fire them, but the law strictly requires that they be paid for it.

If you do see someone clocked in early or late, one option you have is to send them home early by an equivalent amount of time within the same pay period, thereby keeping them out of overtime status. You also should make it really, really clear to your employees that they need to stop doing this. But if they work overtime anyway, the law doesn’t give your company the option of not paying it.

5. When can I announce my new job?

I have had a long job search and finally scored a great job! But with a delayed start date in November, when can I share it on my socials? I am a tiny bit paranoid with The World Happening that something may delay it/cause it to go away (just sheer paranoia, not in any specific field), but also can’t wait to share I am finally Done Searching.

I did share with my references and have signed the offer letter, passed the background check, and have had the manager connect with me on Linkedin to say hi, but I am dying to let my field know I am back, baby!

When you’re considering sharing any news that could potentially fall through at some point, a good rule is to decide based on how bothered you’d be to have to go back and update people later (or to field questions about how the job is going when in fact the job fell through, etc.). If you like the idea of announcing it now more than you dislike the idea of potentially having to share a disappointing update later, then go ahead and announce it. And that’s the most cautious approach, since chances are better than not that it won’t fall through.

That said, there’s potentially some upside to waiting a month or two before you announce: if you’ve been talking to other employers and there’s any chance one of them might come back to you with an offer, or someone in your network might have a perfect job lead that you’d want to pursue despite the job waiting for you in November, there’s an argument for waiting a little longer (on the theory that if they see you announce it now, they might assume you’re not interested in those other things).

The post HR says our horrible coworker is unfireable, employee is getting credit for work I had to completely redo, and more appeared first on Ask a Manager.

(no subject)

Sep. 2nd, 2025 04:57 am
[syndicated profile] apod_feed

Its surface is the most densely cratered in the Solar System -- but what's inside? Its surface is the most densely cratered in the Solar System -- but what's inside?


[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by Deminime

Who is working class? The United States Labor Day holiday got its start in 1893 with the death of 30 strikers during the Pullman Strike, as pdb points out in another thread. Eugene Debs, one of the leaders of the Pullman Strike and a later candidate for President of the United States, was imprisoned as a result of that strike. In 2025, the Trump administration terminated union contracts that protected nearly half a million federal workers in what a former political director of the AFL-CIO called "the largest act of union-busting in American history." Between 1893 and 2025, the American labor movement was often associated in the popular imagination with post-agricultural industrial work: the coal miner, the dock worker, the laborer on the factory assembly line1. Management jobs and the professions were not considered laborers, but bourgeoisie, leading to a rising and ongoing association between manual labor and anti-intellectualism in the United States that was historically less present in Europe.

The early imagery of the working class is replete with depiction of human laboring bodies, while the mute compulsion driving their labor is most often metaphorically depicted as chains—debt and wages2—do not easily lend themselves to visual representation. Yet at the center of debates over labor is that unbreakable connection between bodies and time. Marx's insight was to change the terms of that economic debate: rather than seeing economic activity as a matter of reasonable, utility-maximizing individual agents making free choices to produce and consume what suits them best, Marx demonstrated that economic activity could instead be seen as a matter of the powerful owners of capital siphoning off the surplus value produced by the workers in order to enrich themselves and promote continuing economic growth—at least until the next moment of economic crisis, when capitalists will be rescued by government, but the poor will suffer what they must. Technological advances resulted in labor-intensive processes being replaced by capital-intensive processes, and resulted as well in reconfigurations of work to the point where not only body-intensive manual labor was replaceable, but also the white-collar work of those whom Robert Reich would describe as "symbolic-analytic labor." The routinization of urban office work produced new sites of economic precarity3 for the further appropriation of value by capital, as well as a hollowing-out of American cities that became places for the wealthy and the bourgeoisie to work but not to live near the urban poor4, who could become a reserve army of the unemployed. The new precariat would inherit the effects of Charles Babbage's efficiency studies and their extension in Frederick Winslow Taylor's "scientific management" and later time-motion studies that would determine how many seconds, for example, it should take a secretary to file a document, paving the way for future debates over wage theft, but that also resulted in the invention of the Carnegie Unit or college credit hour. While Adam Smith's labor theory of value was a theory of relative prices (things cost different amounts for consumers due to the different amounts of labor that go into them), Karl Marx's value theory of labor was a theory of relative exploitation. The American boom of wealth and productivity that followed WWII saw the widespread acceptance of the 40-hour work week5 and corresponding increased belief in Americans as consumers rather than laborers, and the 1817 slogan of utopian socialist Robert Owen—"Eight hours for work, eight hours for rest, eight hours for what we will"—was largely forgotten. At the same time, increased participation by women in labor markets led to shifts in the American class structure and the rise of "pink-collar work" and other forms of caring and gendered labor, including the recognition that women perform6 a great deal of uncompensated labor. Shifts away from an economy of goods and toward an economy of services also raised questions about the nature of labor involved in producing and consuming services, and about the nature of "experience goods" like movies and education that one pays to consume: how much (and what kind of) labor gets expended in what we typically consider recreation or non-productive behaviors? The commodification of work has resulted in a corresponding commodification of play7 for those fortunate enough to have the time to play. Debates over the commodification of play became more visible in the early 2000s with the phenomenon of goldfarming and the use of coerced labor, and the representation of goldfarming took many back to the old farm-based8 feudal metaphors of digital serfdom. Former Valve games economist and Finance Minister of Greece Yanis Varoufakis has labeled our current economic epoch one of Techno-Feudalism (previously), wherein contemporary capitalists use their platforms as a form of economic coercion over unfree labor. An apparent glaring mismatch in that comparison is that feudal lords held patriarchal responsibility for the well-being and protection of their serfs, whereas today's corporations dismiss any such responsibility as non-economic "externalities," leading to a condition of widespread economic precarity interpreted as individual malady9. Capitalism's unique feature is to atomize the power of the individual but collectivize the workings of capital, so that capital's invisible hand seems irresistible: the message becomes that there is nothing we, collectively, can or should do about the economy. The key line in the Johnny Paycheck song10 is "If I had the guts to say": the rhetorical construction of capital is that it cannot be answered. We are now taught, according to J. K. Gibson-Graham, that "economy" is
a force to be reckoned with outside of politics and society, located both above as a mystical abstraction, and below as the grounded bottom line. . . With the shift from an understanding of the economy as something that can be managed (by people, the state, the IMF) to something that governs society, the economic imaginary has seemingly lost its discursive mandate and become an objective reality. (New Keywords,"Economy" 94–97)
In such an "objective reality," labor for the market becomes a priority, and other areas of human endeavor fall away: all education becomes vocational education, with students tracked into different classes depending upon their potential for profitability, the humanities and the arts are dismissed as either unprofitable or luxury goods, and schooling becomes an extension of the factory11. Yet we know that money is not the only yardstick of value, as the apocryphal quotation sometimes attributed to Emma Goldman12 implies. Marxist economists Stephen Resnick and Richard Wolff propose a reading of Capital volume 2 that defines socioeconomic class as a process of appropriation: capitalists appropriate the value of the factory worker's labor at the site of production, but the appropriation of value by different parties can occur at different points in the cycle of production, distribution, use/consumption, and re-production. An independent musician appropriates the value of her own labor by practicing or busking, and a daughter's pleasure in cooking a meal for her elderly grandfather becomes the appropriation of value, as well. Such a reading radically opens up the space of economic possibility by expanding our sense of what value means. Today, if we're going to give our labor the respect it deserves, we might think about the economic metaphors through which we see the world: are we Pareto-optimizing, utility-maximizing agents rationally choosing what we consume and produce—or are we members of communities whose bonds go beyond those of money, seeking to guard ourselves and our loved ones from exploitation, and wanting to put our money, our time, and our labor into the activities and enterprises that sustain those communities? Happy Labor Day! Notes
  1. Bruce Springsteen, "Factory"
  2. Johnny Cash, "Sixteen Tons"
  3. The Bangles, "Manic Monday"
  4. Stevie Wonder, "Living for the City"
  5. Dolly Parton, "9 to 5"
  6. Donna Summer, "She Works Hard for the Money"
  7. Loverboy, "Working for the Weekend"
  8. Brass Against, "Maggie's Farm"
  9. Dire Straits, "Industrial Disease"
  10. Johnny Paycheck, "Take This Job and Shove It"
  11. Green Day, "Working Class Hero"
  12. Sophie Ellis Bextor, "If I Can't Dance"
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by needled

The South Korean National Assembly opened its regular session on Monday, September 1, 2025. Assembly Speaker Rep. Woo Won-shik of the ruling Democratic Party suggested wearing hanbok for the occasion as a show of unity. All parties except the main opposition People Power Party showed up in varied styles of hanbok, with some even wearing the traditional gat headwear during the session and subsequent interviews. PPP members showed up in black funereal garb.

Graham Greene, RIP

Sep. 1st, 2025 11:53 pm
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by Ideefixe

Dies: Oscar-Nominated 'Dances With Wolves' Actor Was 73 The trailblazing Canadian First Nations actor who opened doors for Indigenous actors in Hollywood, died September 1 in a Toronto hospital after a long illness. The Oscar nominee from Dances with Wolves was 73.
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by paduasoy

The artist Eleanor Morgan writes about gathering spiders' silk herself, and about the practice's history. Her book Gossamer Days: Spiders, Humans and Their Threads is reviewed at Caught by the River.
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by chavenet

The site's now characteristic tone of performative erudition—hyperrational, dispassionate, contrarian, authoritative—often masks a deeper recklessness. Ill-advised citations proliferate; thought experiments abound; humane arguments are dismissed as emotional or irrational. Logic, applied narrowly, is used to justify broad moral positions. The most admired arguments are made with data, but the origins, veracity, and malleability of those data tend to be ancillary concerns. from The Lonely Work of Moderating Hacker News [The New Yorker, from 2019; ungated]

It's Labor Day

Sep. 1st, 2025 01:09 pm
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by evilmomlady

It's labor day in the USA. Picnics, sales... and oh yeah, celebrating workers' rights won the hard way through labor unions. Here's a bit of history, and some protests you can join today.

From UnionPlus.org "Working people began organizing and bargaining collectively to advocate for better working conditions and wages and celebrated the first Labor Day in New York City on Tuesday, September 5, 1882. Following the deaths of 13 workers during the Pullman Strike in June of 1894, President Grover Cleveland made reconciliation with the labor movement a top priority of his administration, making Labor Day a federal holiday in 1894. " Visit mobilize.us for events and rallys near you, including the Women's March "Workers Over Billionaires" and Indivisible's "Stop the Cuts." You don't have to register, you can show up. East coast events starting in an hour!

Exhuming McCarthy

Sep. 1st, 2025 07:02 am
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by chavenet

What makes [Cormac] McCarthy's library so intriguing is not just its size, nor the fact that very few people know about it. His books, many of which are annotated with margin comments, promise to reveal far more about this elusive literary giant than the few cagey interviews he gave when he was alive. For as long as people have been reading McCarthy, they have speculated about which books and authors informed and inspired his work, a subject he was loath to discuss. They have wondered about his interests and true personality because all he presented to the public was a reclusive, austere, inscrutable facade. from Two Years After Cormac McCarthy's Death, Rare Access to His Personal Library Reveals the Man Behind the Myth [Smithsonian]
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by Wordshore

(with apologies to Tom Jones) Tote bags vary wildly, fron the cheap to the not so cheap. In a recent thread, an outbreak of tote bag chat [1][2][3][4][5][6] occurred. How do you hold yours? Do you have a beloved Tote bag? How did you acquire it? Do you have a tote bag anecdote? Or chat about things going on in your life, your neighbourhood, your world, your head, because this is your free thread.
Page generated Sep. 4th, 2025 06:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios