Squelch squelch

Nov. 11th, 2025 07:44 pm
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by chavenet

Two months ago, I joined a local creative writing course in pornographic fiction after a disagreement with George. The complications that led me to this class had more to do with scheduling than sex. I had been gunning for Detective Fiction or maybe Sci-Fi, but only Intro Pornographic Fiction still had openings in the evenings after work. from Porn, a short story by Nick Foretek [The Drift]

To the theater and beyond!

Nov. 11th, 2025 07:15 pm
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by downtohisturtles

In honor of 2025 marking the 30th anniversary of Pixar's Toy Story, Animation Obsessive looks at how the Toy Story you see now is not the Toy Story you remember.
[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

I’m off today so here’s an older post from the archives. This was originally published in 2020.

A reader writes:

I’m the executive assistant for a small company. I’m the direct support for the VP of human resources, “Dave,” who is very charismatic and likable and a generally nice guy. He’s also very good looking. However, he’s very professional with great business boundaries. I enjoy working with him.

Two managers in particular, “Karen” and “Nancy,” need to meet with him all the time. All. The. Time. Their departments aren’t undergoing any HR issues, they don’t have any staffing needs, and they’re not hiring or firing anybody right now. They call to schedule multiple meetings a week, drop by to see if he’s available for 1:1s when his schedule doesn’t have a single second free, and call him multiple times a day. Dave always routes them back to me to take a message or schedule them with him. Nancy gets angry with me when I tell her he’s not available and blew up at me last week that I’m “not his chaperone.”

Dave has noticed it and so have a few other execs. Dave’s been very clear about making both of them go through the same process other staff members go through to schedule with him. Just the same, other staff have started calling them his “fan club” and me the “bouncer.”

When I was working with the other assistants and operators on a training, word about his “fan club” had gotten around and one person mentioned that Karen calls me names and tells the other staff I’m in love with Dave and don’t want other women near him, which is why I never let her schedule with him. She even showed me a few emails in which Karen advised her department support professional to go over my head to see Dave and that I wasn’t the “keeper of his zipper.”

I’m not sure how to approach this. I’m more angry than I am embarrassed. I’m also bothered because the support staff report to me, and some of my staff have reported both Nancy and Karen as being difficult to work with and unpleasant in other aspects of the day-to-day, not just in regards to the Dave thing. Where do I start with this?

This is so gross!

If Karen and Nancy were simply trying to meet with Dave all the time, that would be annoying but manageable. Even then, though, at some point Dave would probably need to shut it down more firmly than he has. (Not that he’s at fault here! It sounds like he’s managing an uncomfortable situation pretty professionally — but needs to hear how it’s gone off the rails.)

But this is more than Karen and Nancy trying to get a weird amount of Dave’s attention. Blowing up at your for doing your job, calling you names (!), spreading rumors that you’re in love with him, and ever uttering the words “keeper of his zipper” in a work context is … ugh, so over the line and gross and violating. To you, and also to Dave.

It’s time for you to talk to him. It’s going to be awkward and uncomfortable, and you need to do it anyway. (Remember that the awkwardness is 100% on Karen and Nancy, not you.) He needs to know the full extent of what’s happening, how out of control it’s become, and how it’s affecting you.

If you’re hesitating to do that because it feels uncomfortable or you don’t want to burden him with this or you feel like you should be able to deal with it yourself … you still need to talk to him, for three key reasons. First, he deserves to know what’s being said about him so he can decide for himself how he wants to handle it. It’s not right to let this happen behind his back without informing him. Second, as your boss he needs to be aware that you’re being harassed and mistreated. Third, as the VP of HR, he has a professional obligation to intervene and ensure this is shut down — his job in the company requires it (and there’s a point where not acting will make people question HR’s competence, and how seriously HR would take it if someone else were facing similar issues).

So talk to Dave. Tell him all of it — the name-calling, the yelling at you, the rumors, the undermining you, all of it. And I’m sorry to say, you’re going to have to repeat the “keeper of his zipper” line because that makes it clear just how over the line this has become.

You can tell him you’re embarrassed to have to repeat all this, but it’s important that you tell him it’s happening, and that you tell him it’s at the point that HR needs to intervene and shut it down.

If Dave is as great as he sounds — really, even if he’s only sort of okay — he’s going to be grateful you told him and will deal with it so you don’t have to. It’s his job! Let him have the info he needs to do it.

The post my coworkers have a crush on my boss … and are taking it out on me appeared first on Ask a Manager.

Remembering the 77

Nov. 11th, 2025 05:17 pm
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by subdee

While the nation focused on the government shutdown ending, Trump quietly pardoned 77 people connected to the 2020 election subversion effort, including Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, and the fake electors from swing states.

The Big Names: Rudy Giuliani Trump's personal lawyer who led the fake electors scheme and defamed Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss so viciously that they won a $148 million judgment against him. (He settled in January 2025 for an undisclosed amount after being found in contempt of court twice.) Giuliani has been disbarred in both New York and Washington, D.C. Mark Meadows Trump's White House Chief of Staff from March 2020 to January 2021. Faces state charges in Arizona and Georgia. Sidney Powell The attorney who promoted baseless conspiracy theories about Dominion voting machines "flipping" votes. She plead guilty in the Georgia case and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors. John Eastman The lawyer who wrote the memo outlining how Pence could refuse to certify the election. Facing possible disbarment in Washington, D.C. Kenneth Chesebro The attorney who first proposed the fake electors scheme in a memo to Trump. He plead guilty in the Georgia case. Jenna Ellis Former Trump attorney who promoted false fraud claims. She plead guilty in the Georgia case and struck a cooperation deal that led to her Arizona charges being dropped. Jeffrey Clark The Justice Department official who tried to weaponize DOJ powers to overturn the election, drafted a letter claiming the department found "significant concerns" about fraud in Georgia (his superiors refused to send it). Now works at the Office of Management and Budget. Boris Epshteyn Longtime Trump adviser and campaign lawyer who prosecutors say helped organize the scheme. Christina Bobb Former senior election integrity counsel at the RNC, faces charges in Arizona. All the Fake Electors: The pardon covers fake electors from Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, which are all states Joe Biden won but where Trump's team submitted fraudulent electoral certificates. Key names include: Tyler Bowyer (Arizona fake elector) Kathy Berden (Michigan fake elector) James "Ken" Carroll (Georgia fake elector) Brad Carver (Georgia fake elector) Hank Choate (Michigan fake elector) And dozens more across all seven states Three of these people had already pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors and Trump pardoned them anyway. Trump explicitly stated the pardon "does not apply to the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump" dodging, at least for now, the thorny constitutional question of whether a president can pardon himself.
[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

If you’re the boss, finding the right gifts for your employees can be fraught with questions: How much do you spend? Should you spend the same amount of money on each person? And if you don’t know someone well, how do you make sure they like the gift while still keeping it professional?

For the record: managers don’t have to give their staff members gifts, but it’s a nice gesture if you want to do it, and in some offices it’s expected. (Although here is your obligatory reminder that because of the power dynamics involved, gifts at work should flow down, not up. Managers should never expect or encourage gifts from employees.)

A while back, New York Magazine asked me to put together a gift guide for bosses buying for employees, and I’ve updated it for 2025.

You can read it here.

The post I made a gift guide for each employee on your team appeared first on Ask a Manager.

[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

I’m off today so here’s an older post from the archives. This was originally published in 2020.

A reader writes:

I work in an office where I’m the only person who can do 75% of my job, but there’s a second person who can do essential functions. We have a policy that only one of the two of us is allowed to request advance time off at a given time (so one of us is always in, barring emergencies).

I’m getting married in October, and in relation to that requested — and was approved for — two days before the wedding and the two weeks following. I don’t take much time off and have more than enough “in the bank” to cover that with some left over. It was approved immediately by my supervisor.

Since then, my close coworker (Jane, who covers some of my essential duties) first started asking if I really “need” that much time off. She then dropped a bit of a bombshell on me and said that she “really needs to go to Florida the following weekend (after my wedding) for a cousin’s wedding” so asked if I could be in for the second half of that week as well as the following Monday. I told her that my plans weren’t certain yet, but that I didn’t want to commit to that and leave those requested days open.

That was met with a tirade about how she “always looks out for me” and that I need to “do this one thing for her.”

We normally have a cordial, if not especially friendly, relationship but she has turned nasty and threatened to blackmail me over a a sick day where she claims I “wasn’t really sick.” She had seen me at the grocery, where I was mostly picking up a prescription but also doing general grocery shopping, but don’t have a doctor’s note if push comes to shove. When she brought it up, she said, “That day I saw you at the grocery store, I know you weren’t really sick but were just goofing off for the day. I’ll report you for that.” I responded with, “I was there to pick up a prescription, even though I bought some other things because I didn’t have anything at home that sounded good.” She responded, “If you don’t let me have this, I’m still going to report it.”

(For context, this happened during the work day, probably around 1:00 in the afternoon. Sometimes one of us will go to the store to buy work supplies during the day. When I saw her there, I had just come from the doctor’s office, which is literally right across the street, and was shopping for other things while waiting on a prescription to be filled at the store pharmacy.)

This has gone on for a week and she’s not dropping it that I need to be in those specific days, and I’m not relenting.

There’s a possibility that — for a variety of reasons — I won’t even be working there in October, but at the same time I don’t know how to handle this. I mentioned it in passing to my supervisor, who wasn’t overly interested and he indicated that I was “okay” since I’d requested the time 9+ months in advance. Still, though, I feel that the battle isn’t over yet, and it’s negatively affecting my ability to actually do my day to day job as Jane is refusing to do the small part of her job that I don’t have the proper training/credentials/ability to do.

In addition, there are the logistics that if our supervisor agrees to let us both off, I’m no doubt going have two dozen calls/texts a day on my honeymoon from people who are persistent enough to call me 10 times in a row if I don’t answer. Needless to say, that’s NOT a situation that I want to deal with, but it happens any other day when both of us are off (heck, it happens when I’m off just because of the sheer volume of stuff that she doesn’t care to learn to be able to answer).

Jane is a jerk.

But not a very smart jerk. She thinks she has way more power here than she does! And I think you think she does too.

You requested time off for your wedding and honeymoon nine months in advance. It has been approved. Your manager reiterated that your time off is secure.

Jane’s blackmail attempt is embarrassing — for her. It has no teeth at all. You don’t have anything to hide because you didn’t do anything wrong. You’re allowed to pick up prescriptions when you’re sick. You’re also allowed to buy yourself groceries when you’re sick. But if your manager really doubted you for some reason (which is unlikely), you could always contact your doctor’s office to get documentation that you did indeed have an appointment that day. It probably won’t come to that, though. But if you needed to, know that you could get the back-up you need.

Unless your boss is a complete fool, I can’t imagine he wouldn’t be at least slightly interested in knowing that one of his employees is (a) attempting to blackmail another (b) into altering her wedding and honeymoon plans (c) that have already been approved and (d) is refusing to do part of her job because of a personal vendetta.

I strongly suggest that you talk to him and say this: “Jane is harassing me about the time off I had approved for my wedding and honeymoon. She wants some of those same days and told me that if I don’t change my own time off request, she will report me for misusing a sick day. That’s false. She saw me in the grocery store while I was picking up a prescription on a sick day. I can get a note from my doctor that I was seen that day if you need me to. I think it’s hugely problematic that she’s trying to blackmail me to change my days off, so I want to make sure you’re in the loop that that’s happening. She also is refusing to do (specific work tasks) because she’s upset with me. Obviously, I rely on her to do XYZ to be able to do my own job. Can you intervene, so that her harassment stops and I can do my work?”

If your boss won’t intervene, then he’s passive to the point of negligence and you should say the above to HR as well. This is the kind of BS that managers should handle on their own but which HR will usually step in on if you need them to.

Meanwhile, with Jane, tell her this: “I’m not going to discuss my time off with you any further. If you want to report seeing me in the store picking up a prescription, feel free to. I can get documentation from my doctor if I need to, and I’ll happily let (manager) know the situation myself. But I’m not going to discuss this anymore.” If she continues to push, say, “You need to talk to (manager) about this. It’s not up for discussion between us anymore.”

But if your boss is at all decent, he’ll shut this down once you explain what’s been happening.

If the outcome is that he gives Jane the days off she wants and so you’re both gone on the same dates, let people know ahead of time that you will be on your honeymoon and 100% not reachable. Tell them you won’t be responding to calls or texts, and then stick to that. In fact, block everyone from your office during that time away so you don’t even see it if they’re trying to contact you. If you feel weird about doing that, then tell your boss in advance what you’re worried about, and reiterate that you will be 100% inaccessible. People do this! You’re allowed to take a freakin’ honeymoon without work calls.

But stop fearing Jane. What she’s doing is super messed up in a way no decent manager would condone, you have the power to expose that, and you should use it.

The update to this letter is essential reading! Do not miss it.

The post my coworker is blackmailing me not to take time off for my honeymoon appeared first on Ask a Manager.

[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by h00py

https://www.tcj.com/talking-oglaf-with-trudy-cooper-and-doug-bayne-wed-stay-up-all-night-drawing-stuff-to-make-each-other-laugh/ Trudy and Doug braved a 14-hour time difference to speak over Zoom, and armed with their morning caffeine, spoke candidly about the origins of the strip, their utter lack of planning, the benefits of shame, and how, despite its very long run, an end to Oglaf may be coming sooner than you think.

The Triple Crown

Nov. 11th, 2025 08:18 am
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by maxwelton

In the recent Tokyo World Athletic championships, Melissa Jefferson-Wooden took home three gold medals--winning individual medals in the 100 meter and 200 meter sprints, and ran the first leg for the gold-winning USA 4x100 relay team. World Athletics has produced a short film on Melissa at the Tokyo championship, and it's a corker.
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by chavenet

The liberalization of politics and culture, together with the possibilities for work and leisure opened up by new technologies, have greatly expanded individual rights and freedoms. At the same time, though, the scope of private life itself seems to be shrinking. Our experiences are flattened by the mass culture that everyone consumes, regurgitates, remixes (and that AI is now beginning to remix for us). Social science and marketing—combined with coercive technology—turn what seem, from the first-person perspective, like deeply personal choices into statistically predictable and controllable behaviors. from Qualities Without Men [Commonweal]
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by many-things

A team of scientists has developed a highly accurate blood test for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. The test reads tiny DNA patterns that reveal the biological signature of the illness. For millions who've faced doubt and misdiagnosis, it's a breakthrough that finally validates their experience — and may help diagnose Long Covid too.

Scientists from the University of East Anglia and Oxford BioDynamics have created a highly accurate blood test capable of diagnosing Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, also known as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME/CFS). This new test, which demonstrates 96 percent accuracy, offers renewed hope to patients who have struggled for recognition and reliable answers. Researchers believe the discovery could also lead to a similar test for identifying Long Covid.
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by storybored

Math, Revealed is an engaging, interactive look at some corners of mathematics by math popularizer Stephen Strogatz. Efficient Packing: How bees, beer cans and big data all solve the same problem: not enough space. Taxicab Geometry: In the world of taxicab geometry, pi = 4 and even the Pythagorean theorem takes a back seat.

The Golden Ratio: The secret beauty in apples, stars and your belly button. Bowling for Nobels: How a centuries-old math puzzle helped us see inside the human brain.
[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

I’m off today. Here are some past letters that I’m making new again, rather than leaving them to wilt in the archives.

1. Should you hire employees to babysit?

I help supervise a group of about 20 student workers at a college. Most of them know I have a one-year-old and some of them really love babies (I sometimes bring him by during my non-work hours briefly to make their day). I’ve had at least two workers tell me they’d love to babysit. They’re good responsible workers, but I’ve been uncertain as to the advisability of that and haven’t followed up on their offers. This is likely to come up again as new students come in and learn I have a child. My gut says that babysitting (while paid) is more personal than a typical employment relationship and could blur professional boundaries or lead to an appearance of favoritism, so I should just kindly thank them for the offer and say we’re all set in that department. Is that the right call or am I overthinking this?

People sometimes do this and it’s fine, but if it goes wrong, it can be disastrous. For example, if you hire one of them and there are problems with their care of your child (say you find out they’ve been negligent or cruel), would you be able to keep that from affecting things at work? What if you have a dispute over pay? Are you comfortable leaving them unattended in your home? And you’ve also got to consider the power dynamics; even though they’re volunteering, there’s a risk they’d still feel obligated to say yes when you ask (or that they’ll be happy to do it once or twice but feel pressured after that). It can also make other workers wonder if you favor or give special access to the people who sit for you.

Some people do this and make it work, but if you want to play it safe, it’s wiser not to cross the streams.

2020

2. Locker room etiquette when your gym is full of coworkers

My office recently added some cool new perks on top of our employee benefits. My favorite? They’re now offering anyone who wants it a free membership to the gym right across the street from our office. It’s been hard for me to work out previously because of my commute, so I’ve been taking full advantage of this perk since it took effect a couple months ago. Lots of my other coworkers have jumped on this perk as well, and I’ll run into them at the gym frequently. Overall, it’s been positive, but there’s one thing I don’t know how to handle — the locker rooms.

I’m pretty comfortable in my body, and I’m not that awkward about changing in your standard locker room full of strangers. But the prospect of a coworker — or worse, my boss — walking in on me changing has me feeling incredibly awkward. So far, I haven’t been seen by my coworkers while changing and haven’t walked in on anyone else from my office, but I know it’s only a matter of time. This is a situation I’ve never encountered before — I didn’t know anyone who worked out at my previous gyms. What should I do if I run into a coworker in the locker room while one or both of us are in various states of undress? Should I just change in the toilet stalls to avoid anyone seeing me? I might be making a bigger deal of this in my head than it actually is, but it has me feeling really uncomfortable.

It’s pretty much the same locker room code as always: There’s a collective agreement to ignore everyone else’s nudity.

The last time this came up, a commenter offered this, which I really liked:

“I think there’s a big difference between functional nudity and casual nudity at the gym. Functional = in order to change, I have to take off my clothes. I am no longer 12 and trying to hide my body at all costs, so if someone glances over at me while I am changing, they will see me naked. Casual nudity = I am wandering around naked, blow drying my hair naked, etc. This is fine generally in a locker room, but is best to avoid at a work gym. Though I would totally blow dry my hair wearing a bra and not a shirt to avoid getting hot/sweaty.”

In other words, make any nudity fairly quick. Don’t linger.

But it’s also completely fine to decide you’re just not comfortable with locker room nudity around coworkers at all and change in a stall. There’s no shame in that; you’re not being weirdly prudish if you got that route.

2019

3. Is it unprofessional to brush my hair in common areas of my workplace?

I am an assistant manager, and today something weird happened. I did not get to finish my normal routine this morning as I had to go to the UPS store (for work) so I showed up to work with my hairbrush. I work at a preschool and typically, by the time I arrive to work, there are no parents here as they have all dropped off their kids and left. I walked around to say good morning to the teachers and collect breakfast dishes as normal, but I brought my hair brush along and brushed my hair as I was walking between the classrooms.

The manager above me made a point to rush up to me and tell me I need to do my beauty stuff in the bathroom. I was confused by this as I thought she meant the makeup in my purse but no, she explained that me brushing my hair was unprofessional. I am young, so maybe this is just a rule on professionalism I have never heard before. I am just confused. This was pretty much a one-time thing, and not a habit I have. Is it really all that unprofessional in this otherwise rather relaxed atmosphere for a work setting?

Yeah, there’s an etiquette rule about not doing personal grooming in public. Some workplaces might not have thought it was a big deal, and it’s not the biggest deal in the world, but it’s also not outlandish for your manager to ask you not to do it. (It’s also the kind of thing that can be frowned upon without anyone telling you, so it’s good that she did. She might have done that because you’re young and she figured that you’re still learning professional norms.)

2019

4. I accidentally sent a highly personal medical email to someone who reports to me

I am currently on maternity leave and will return to work in a couple of months. While I’ve been out, I’ve emailed my team at work a few times with baby updates and replied to anyone personally saying hello, all from my personal email as I no longer have access to my work email.

Yesterday, I sent an unrelated and angry email about a very personal medical matter to a person on my team by accident. This person reports to me. The first three letters of her name in her email are the same three letters of the person I was trying to email instead, so you can see how I sent this by accident and this worker’s email was saved because of the above previous correspondence while I’ve been off.

It was only caught because the worker emailed me back acknowledging this wasn’t meant for her. I’m mortified. How can I save face? All I’ve done so far is email her back thanking her, apologizing, and stating that I trust her to keep this between us because of the personal nature. Is this all I can do and never speak of it again?

Yes! You handled it well. If she’s at all a decent person, she’ll understand that this kind of mistake happens and will keep it to herself. We’ve all been there with a misdirected email at some point or another, and most people are sympathetic when it happens.

You don’t need to take any further action; anything more would be belaboring the point and focusing her on it more. Assume you’ll both wipe it from your minds and never speak of it again.

2019

5. How to bring up experience at an interview that I forgot to mention on my resume

I’m returning to work after doing a postgraduate degree. I’ve got an interview coming up, and in the course of prepping for it I realized that one of the projects from the job I had before going back to study is in a really closely related area to the role I’m interviewing for. The problem is that I hadn’t mentioned that project in either my cover letter or my CV when applying. Obviously I want to bring up this relevant experience in the interview, but what’s the best way to frame it in a way that is more “this candidate has useful experience” and less “this candidate didn’t fully think through their application”?

Just be matter-of-fact about it! “I realized one of the projects I did at Job X might be relevant here. It’s not on my resume, but (details about the project).” No reasonable interviewer is going to think not including it originally means you’re flighty or thoughtless. Interviewers know lots of people use the same basic resume for all the jobs they apply for, and they also know humans will not always instantly realize precisely how relevant something might be to a job they’re not terribly familiar with yet.

I’ve interviewed many candidates where I thought, “Oh! That’s really relevant — I’m glad you mentioned it.” Sometimes I’ve even thought, “Oooh, you should include that on your resume! It’ll help you!” But I’ve never thought, “What kind of doofus didn’t write this down originally?”

2020

The post should you hire employees to babysit, locker room etiquette when your gym is full of coworkers, and more appeared first on Ask a Manager.

[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by GenjiandProust

The dark season is closing in (in the northern hemisphere, yes), and we can enjoy new seasons of Modem Prometheus (Anthology with Frame) and The Phosphene Catalogue (somewhere between an Audio Drama and an Anthology with Frame). It's been a while, so expect another round up before the end of the year. Oddly, there are a number of shows this time that are game tie-ins.

Stories with LGBTQ characters and elements are identified when possible. Podcasts with frequent or severe content warnings are noted as are those which provide transcripts. All the podcasts are accessible via most podcast apps and aggregators (although, weirdly, some apps seem to not catch entire seasons of some of the shows). Most of the series have episodes that run ~25-35 minutes; Exceptions will be noted. Shows are identified as: • audio drama – stories with continuing plots and casts, either open- or closed-ended • anthology – stand-alone stories with no continuity • anthology with frame – stand-alone stories with some kind of continuity that ties the series together but (usually) does not affect the stories 400 Words A Horror (Anthology) Short horror and weird fiction stories by new creators still learning about audio storytelling, although occasionally better-known voice actors lend their talents. As a result, the writing and acting varies quite a bit, and those seeking very professional productions will want to look elsewhere, but the Longer episodes tend to have multiple stories with a connecting theme. Transcripts in the show notes. Frequency: irregular (sometimes biweekly, sometimes monthly) Length: 20-40 minutes Tone: Varied LGBTQ: mostly queer stories by mostly queer creators Two seasons (16 episodes; ongoing) Website At the Bottom of the Garden (Audio Drama) There are fairies at the bottom of our garden. It's a good first line. Straightforward, but evocative. Obviously indicative of genre, without giving away too much. Sets clear expectations in the reader for the story that's going to follow. You know what you're getting into, with a first line like that. Except, it isn't the first line to a story. It isn't from a book, a magazine, or even a website. It's the first line of a journal. Aiden begins to research his great great aunt's journal and discovers increasingly weird things. As he gets drawn deeper into the mystery, he and his boyfriend Chris try and unravel the mystery before it dooms both of them. Format warning: use of distortion and disorienting sound effects. Transcripts available. It looks like the story is completed. Length: mostly 5-30 minutes Tone: Folk horror, fairies, paranormal investigation LGBTQ: trans narrator Complete story (40 episodes) Website Baron Sordor's Theatre of the Doomed (Anthology) This podcast aims to take you back to a golden age when live radio plays ruled the airwaves and Orson Wells' Mercury Theatre convinced an entire nation they were under attack by Martians. Paying homage to 1960's classics like the Twilight Zone and The Outer Limits as well as some of the masters of modern sci-fi and horror like King, Carpenter, Peele, Dick and Gibson, Baron Sordor's Theatre of the Doomed is an anthology podcast that takes its listeners on a journey to the darkest recess of the human mind. Full-cast episodes, with a mix of one-shots and 2- and 2-parters. No transcripts, but there is a novel of the 3-parter. Frequency: irregular (every 2-4 months) Length: 60-120 minutes Tone: Varied LGBTQ: little to none Two seasons (11 episodes; ongoing) Website Black Velvet Fairies (Audio Drama) Upon her death, Lucy Verdell's estranged grandmother leaves her four black velvet paintings of fairies. But not twinkly sprites — stoic beings with wings of light and grim intent. As Lucy investigates her family's connection to the artwork, she uncovers a web of believers who will do anything to reconnect Earth with the mysterious fairy-world known as Hada. This is part of a multi-media world with a novel and tie-in games. It also has an in-world tie-in blog. Frequency: weekly Length: 15-30 minutes Tone: investigating a mystery; interdimentional travel LGBTQ: none One season (13 episodes; supplemental episode) Website Brittle Tourniquet (Audio Drama) After some bad luck and some bad choices, Jenny Bitters has lost her cabal, her lover, and most of her self respect. So she decides to get back in the villain game by summoning Arida, a lost and forbidden goddess, and take on the world of gods and cabals. With some more questionable decisions, she finds herself committed to an impossible heist and opposing the worst sorts of gods. Transcripts available on the website. Length: 30-50 minutes Tone: competing magical organizations LGBTQ: trans woman narrator, other trans and queer characters Complete story (8 episodes) Website Broken Veil (Audio Drama) Writers Will Maclean (The Apparition Phase) and Joel Morris (Charlie Brooker's Wipe) investigate weird, unsettling, possibly supernatural stories that have affected their friends, and explore the places where they might have happened. As they dig into the upsetting stories, a larger picture seems to take shape. I classified this as an audio drama, but the first 4 or so episodes are more like an anthology with a frame. Length: 30-50 minutes Tone: investigations of weird events, rising conspiracy LGBTQ: none significant Complete story (6 episodes) Apparently, no website, although it's also hosted on YouTube Clawmoor Heights (Audio Drama) Agatha Quinn, a truefolk historian, risks professional ruin when she's drawn into the turbulent affairs of a dying Baron and his idle children as he attempts to preserve his family's legacy. Part fantasy, part horror, part country house murder mystery, this podcast is part of a larger media project, with a TTRPG (Our Brilliant Ruin), a comic, and a video game. Also posted to YouTube. Length: 20-30 minutes Tone: Fantasy world in decay and mystery-solving LGBTQ: lesbian supporting characters Complete story (10 episodes) Website Fabric (Audio Drama) After the death of her parents, Leyna Canary discovers a cache of strange audio tapes hidden in their attic, each labeled with an unfamiliar name — Lucas Canary. As she unravels their origins, Leyna is pulled into a shadowy world of malevolent supernatural forces and the black-book task force keeping them at bay, leading her across rural New South Wales, Australia — and into the heart of something far more dangerous than she could ever imagine. A new season is expected in 2026. Frequency: season one was released in 3 batches across 2 weeks Length: 25-30 minutes Tone: conspiracy, men in black LGBTQ: none One season (9 episodes; ongoing) Website Go I Know Not Wither (audio drama) Follow Sasha, as they drive through the Siberian woods telling their story into a tape recorder so that it will be kept alive. Stories after all only live if others take their weight too. Knowing this, Sasha relays their life from birth, when they gained powers, all the way to the mysterious events that left them only with a truck, a tape recorder, and a bloody jacket. Oh, and we can't forget the wolf. Based on Russian folklore and tales. Length: 15-25 minutes Tone: folk horror LGBTQ: a gender variant narrator Complete story (10 episodes) Apparently, no website The Greatest Matter (Audio Drama) On a cold winter's evening in Dublin in the late 1890s, Professor Cesare Lombroso, a renowned Italian criminologist, arrives in the city to give a public talk. In attendance are Frances, a novelist keen to learn more about the distinguished professor's work, and Margaret, a hard-working Dublin journalist. Meanwhile, a man has been gruesomely murdered in the nearby Phoenix Park, and the authorities appear to be covering it up. As the Dublin Metropolitan Police begin inquiries, a powerful English military commander leads a sinister parallel investigation, and Frances and Margaret become increasingly intent on solving the crime, and the wider coverup, no matter the cost. The murder, Frances and Margaret soon come to realise, may have disturbing connections with spiritualism. Transcripts available on the website. There may be a second story coming. Length: 25-35 minutes Tone: governmental corruption and spiritualism LGBTQ: lesbian couple Complete story (12 episodes) Website Nightfall (Anthology) Nightfall was a radio drama series produced and aired by CBC Radio from July 1980 to June 1983. While primarily a supernatural/horror series, Nightfall featured some episodes in other genres, such as science fiction, mystery, fantasy, and human drama. Some of Nightfall's episodes were so terrifying that the CBC registered numerous complaints and some affiliate stations dropped it. Length: 30-35 minutes Tone: Twilight Zone LGBTQ: none One season (71 episodes) Apparently, no website Unknown 9: Out of Sight (audio Drama) Blake Elrich is an investigative paranormal podcaster cursed with knowing things he wishes he didn't. Along with his enigmatic producer Lazari, he travels the country seeking out regular people with uncanny stories—those with knowledge of the Unknown. As you'll soon discover, the strange cases, eerie locations, and peculiar characters Blake and Lazari encounter all have essential ties to the larger universe. Part of a larger media property, including a video game. The story continues in a new series. Length: 30-45 minutes Tone: paranormal investigation, occult plots LGBTQ: none Threes seasons (27 episodes) Apparently, no website Voices of the Trench (Anthology) Between centuries of suffering and torment, many stories can be told: of good and evil, faith and heresy, naive longing and forbidden desire. In another age, the veneer of civilization would have been thicker and the boundaries between categories more blurred. But this is not the age of the Trench Crusade. So let us listen to ... the voices of the trench. Medium length fan fiction based on the Trench Crusade miniatures rules – men and women cast into horrifying seemingly endless conflict making difficult choices with their souls as the fuel and cost. Frequency: irregular, weekly to monthly Length: 60-75 minutes Tone: WWI with demons and worse things LGBTQ: none One season (7 episodes; ongoing) Apparently, no website
[syndicated profile] maru_feed

Posted by mugumogu

みりはまたすごい所に座ってるね! Miri, you’re sitting in a great place! ぽかぽか太陽の下で一緒に日向ぼっこしているはなみり。 はなはすぐに背中が熱いくらいに温まるけど、 […]
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by JHarris

Hello everyone, it's time for a new LINKME post! It's a kind of free thread, but where the main purpose is for people to contribute links they like but for some reason they don't want to make in a full post. Maybe you don't want to deal with comments, or don't think it's important enough for the front page, or think it'd be too much effort to make a post? And then others, if they choose, can take your links and make a full post about them. It's the no stress place for things you've found on the web. Inside is a recap of the last linkme thread.

If you decide to make a post on a contributed link, it'd be nice if you could link to the comment that inspired it, and include the tag linkme in the post. Here are the major links from last month's post. It's still possible to give these sad little links https://www.metafilter.com/contribute/post_preview.mefia good home in a FPP! Glinn: Robert Irwin (son of Steve) on Dancing with the Stars Art_Pot: voting inside a stuff blue whale in Sweden (Reddit) as_night_falls: photos from a month-long closure of Joffre Lakes Park in British Columbia chavenet: "Wanda Kinsky and Related Matters," on Thomas Pynchon aleph: Machine Learnability as a Measure of Order in Aperiodic Sequences, an academic paper Wobbuffet: Excerpts from a book on visiting cemetaries Wobbuffet: On Jane Austen, Laura Klein on music Jane Austen listened to, including Youtube playlists, and a lithub post on Why We're Still Reading Jane Austen on he 250th Birthday Wobbuffet: The Oxford Ancient Languages Society uploaded a video to Youtube of a production of Euripides' Orestes in its original Greek, and videos about its recreation, and Barnard College's production of Euripides' Herakles jamjam: A Thermometer For Measuring Quantumness JHarris (I wonder who that could be): the 512KB Club lists websites that are less than half a megabyte in size (posted to the front page by chavenet here) JHarris: TechCrunch on a project to create an open source printer sciatrix: a Tumblr post containing notes from the book Grey Ghosts and Red Rangers, about the history of fox hunting in the US, which wasn't always about harming the fox which_chick: a link about growing and caring for the house plant Pothos, which is actually only the young form of the plant, and its adult form, and a Youtube video about caring for that form dick dale the vampire: A Sudoku "metroidvania," Sudokuvania: Digits of Despair eekernohan: Morten Rank-Henriksen on salty licorice, on Tiktok chromecow: An essay on wank, defined as careless speech designed to gratify/soothe the speaker, as opposed to Bullshit (PDF), it turns out this link had already been FPP'd in September metahawk: presents Anthropic's paper about tracing the thoughts of a LLM (summary) JoeZydeco: Fire destroys South Korea's cloud storage system, no backups lock robster: The Good Driver Paradox, I build a fake dumpster for stealth camping, reverse engineering obfuscated C code, and how programmers flex on each other, with explanation lock robster: Catalytic converters are simple, but getting them to work is not paduasoy: beautiful black cats on Finch (Reddit), although note that some of the cats have since deceased chavenet: a photo of Timothy Leary's copy of Gravity's Rainbow (Reddit) paduasoy: Making a Tartan Armadillo without a pattern (posted to the front page by me) gudrun: (Substack) Zombies and Vampires (and anti-vaxxers), by Josh Hartigan 99_: from Bluesky, Bari Weiss' memo to CBS News, good for angrying up the blood JopeZydeco: a visual archive of Byte Magazine mittens: an article about LLMs and creativity, FPP made by chavenet paduasoy: a report from the 2025 Knitting History Forum Conference paduasoy: the Brighton cat tour JHarris: the 100 year history of Barney Google and Snuffy Smith, which I then made into a FPP paduasoy: an articule about knitted or crocheted post box toppers in the UK from 2022 99_: the Youtube page of DJ Bobby Ghanoush

In Praise of dhh

Nov. 10th, 2025 09:20 pm
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by maupuia

A reflection on Ruby's past, present, and future. From: "He could be arrogant, and brash. He was maybe a little too self-satisfied. But on the whole I would say he was someone I admired, someone I looked up to. He was a role model." to: "I have good news for you, though: assholes are a minority. People of conscience, people with good will and good intentions have always outnumbered psychopaths and sycophants."
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by glaucon

Act I: They're Kicking Us Out of the Station "...I didn't see the transmitter turn off" | Act II: A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace, or The Takeover | Act III: I'll try to find you left of the dial | Epilogue: Take Action

Act I: They're Kicking Us Out of the Station..."I didn't see the transmitter turn off" A Thoughtless Takeover It all happened suddenly on a Zoom call Friday morning on October 3rd, 2025 in Cleveland, OH. After months of private negotiations, WCSB employees learned that effective immediately, WCSB programming was being handed over to Ideastream Public Media, Cleveland's local CPB and NPR operator for TV and Radio. The station would immediately transition to playing Jazz as JazzNEO, moving away from independent, student run campus radio free-form format. Not only was the change sudden, but CSU had police escort WCSB station staff off property, leaving them scrambling to try and save decades of archives, station memorabilia and more. Worse, Cleveland State didn't prepare for backlash over the whole thing, with university officials giving public criticism little thought. What was (is?) WCSB to Cleveland? The host of Odd Girl Hour on WCSB writes about her personal loss. A Profound Loss Of course, Ideastream itself is facing increased pressure due to federal funding cuts. They've now added local community protest and support for WCSB to their list of troubles, in addition to a key question about whether or not the deal was even legal to begin with. Harsh scrutiny is being placed not just on Ideastream, but CSU and CSU President, Laura Bloomberg, who offered a typical crisis PR statement about the change. Interestingly, she was granted a seat on Ideastream's board as a result of the takeover. WCSB may never return. The history of similar takeovers offers yet another chilling look into the current political and quality of life challenges facing America with respect to media consolidation and on campus free speech. WCSB incomplete archives here and here. Act II: A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace, or The Takeover 97x: The Future of Rock & Roll (sadly) 97x was my station growing up. You may have heard of it because of the movie Rain Man. Their slogan, "97x: The future of Rock and Roll" led station breaks or played before songs, and was adapted by Dustin Hoffman during filming as a repeated phrase for his character because the crew listened to WOXY during filming in Cincinnati. This station was my lifeline to music that didn't fit into acceptable, mainstream America. Each Memorial Day, starting in 1989, they featured the definitive list of 500 modern rock songs, adapted year-over-year as newer music appeared and influenced the landscape. You can review the lists here. Other radio stations featuring classic rock, oldies and other nostalgic or top 40 music had started aligning decades prior to play the same music across the country. But in the 70's and 80's, 97x and a host of college radio stations like it offered important platforms for unique, brown, queer, artistic voices that were largely ignored on the commercial stations, bringing incredible music to American airwaves. And these stations, artists and songs were important for Gen X youth, restless and anxious as they were, always seeking ways to assert independence. Alternative and independent music was one of the key elements for shaping their worldview. The future should have been bright for independent media like 97x. But something changed. 97x was sold to First Broadcasting Investment Partners for $5.6 million in January 2004. Side Note: First Broadcasting Investment Partners was a vulture capital firm founded by Ron Unkefer, a CSU grad. Is it too much to wonder, despite this not being mentioned anywhere in media reporting, if he was an advisor on the WCSB "deal" with Ideastream? And because of the WOXY acquisition, as for many other stations like it, 97x had their last terrestrial broadcast on Thursday, May 13, 2004, a definitive moment for me, listening and crying in bed along with the DJs as they signed off, one by one, until the very last goodbye from station manager Steve Baker after playing "Sunday, Bloody Sunday," the first song they ever played on 97x. His goodbye is preserved forever here.* So, how in the goddamn hell did the 90's (nearly completely) kill college radio? We can broadly thank the Telecommunications Act of 1996, passed 91-5 in the Senate and signed by Bill Clinton into law on February 8, 1996. The law's purpose was to foster competition while relaxing media ownership regulations. It also removed the cap on radio station ownership rules. There was also a measure to prohibit indecency and obscenity on the Internet, though this was ruled unconstitutional. Except for Section 230, which enabled the growth of the internet but at what cost? Other free thinkers of the day recognized that relaxing media ownership rules (and permitting more monopolistic behavior from broadband corporations) would be, ah, not good. Radio homogenization resulted in catastrophic consequences for the industry: -More than a third of all US radio stations had been bought and sold -Of the 4,992 total stations across 268 set radio markets, almost half are now owned by a company owning three or more stations in the same market -The number of stations owned by the ten largest companies increased by roughly fifteen times between 1985 and 2005 Lydia Polgreen summed up much of the consolidation in a 1999 piece for Washington Monthly, The Death of Local Radio. Act III: I'll try to find you...left of the dial What's left when you're left? For WCSB, some supporters hope that WCSB can be re-established. I am xcsb has popped up to offer hope for the future of WCSB, not only to help continue to build community support to try and reverse the takeover, but providing info about activities to help. This includes a weekly, Friday DJ set in November with WCSB DJs at a great local venue to stay connected and support efforts to re-establish WCSB. And for 97x, there was a bit of rebirth in 2023, at least for the Modern Rock 500. You can see the list here. But most importantly, there are signs Gen Z may be listening to college radio in greater numbers, offering hope and skepticism. Epilogue: Take Action WCSB xcsb.org is encouraging people to sign a petition at Change.org to bring back WCSB From the xcsb website, they are also encouraging supporters to call to try and restore WCSB to the airwaves (you can find that yourself if you're so inclined) This Thursday, November 13th, 2025: Join KEXP (more below) by tuning in for Music Heals: Grief Organizations / Other College Radio Foundation Music First Coalition Great current college / alt radio stations: KEXP (Listen here on the station site | Live show archive on YouTube with interviews) Listen to college radio stations The 7 Best College Radio Stations You Can Listen to Online 30 amazing college radio stations From Reddit: What's popular in college radio right now? Any recommendations for good radio stations? 97x history The History of 97x The definitive 97x archive, maintained by former DJ, Craig Froehle More about 97x here Metafilter post about 97x More about radio & media consolidation here, here, here, here, here *Yes, I cried again relistening to that last broadcast while making this post, and always will.

Alt-Choc

Nov. 10th, 2025 08:41 pm
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by chavenet

After hovering mostly between $1,000 and $3,000 per metric ton for decades, cocoa prices rocketed to about $12,500 at the end of last year. Bad weather, blight and aging trees combined to cause massive crop failures in West Africa, where roughly 70% of the world's cocoa is grown. Illegal mining, driven by soaring gold prices, has also ravaged small-scale farms in Ghana. Although prices have moderated, I don't believe this crisis is at an end. Cocoa remains much more expensive in nominal terms than ever before in recorded history. Unless there are profound changes in how and where it's grown, there's no reason to expect a return to steady, lower prices. No wonder the confectionary industry is rushing to limit its exposure. from I Saw a Vision of Chocolate's Future in an Amsterdam Brownie [Bloomberg; ungated]
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by Roger Dodger

The Cooperative National Geologic Map This site is an educational tool and introduction to the Nation's geology. The geologic layers were compiled using a standardized process, funded by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program. Layers for the Cooperative National Geologic Map were assembled from about 100 geologic maps of states or large regions produced by State Geological Surveys and the USGS.

The beta site was previously mentioned in 2016 in this thread about Flyover App.

Birds don't know about Brexit

Nov. 10th, 2025 06:56 pm
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by rabia.elizabeth

Spain's declining red kite population gets an assist from the UK A couple decades ago, ornithologists in Spain and the UK cooperated to send some of Spain's then-plentiful red kite chicks to the British Isles in hopes that the species would recover there. The effort met with smashing success. 30 years on, Great Britain returns the favor.

Spain's red kite population has declined severely, mostly due to electrocution on power lines as well as shootings and poisonings. In an act of optimism, British and Spanish kite lovers recently cooperated to send some of the descendants of that original crop of chicks back to Spain. So far, results have been promising, but the threat from humans remains an unresolved issue. Power lines in Spain have begun to be made bird-safe, at least. The visually striking red kite, with its rusty plumage and broad white wingbands, flies deftly and sings in an unforgettable way. SEO Birdlife, a conservation society that publishes an excellent guide to the birds of Spain, notes that the red kite likes to sleep in groups during the winter and prefers groves for its cold- weather communal lodging. SEO Birdlife article on the red kite, with audio samples of song and video Acción para el Mundo Salvage, the group that runs the wildlife hospital where the British chicks spent some time before their release Article on declining migrating bird populations in Andalucia, published by the Andalucia Bird Society
[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

A reader writes:

I run outbound marketing for a tech startup serving founders and salespeople. We often send promotional/announcement emails from my email address to subscribers who have opted in to receive our updates.

We recently sent a very harmless and innocuous announcement message, to which I received the following reply: “Why the FUCK am I getting this email”

The message was from a personal Gmail account and included the sender’s cell phone number. A quick LinkedIn search revealed that the sender is employed at a major financial services firm as a personal wealth advisor (investment manager) for high net worth individuals.

What he doesn’t know is, I’m a client of his firm. While he is not my investment advisor, one of his colleagues is, and his unreasonable reply — in response to a message he opted in to receive — honestly makes me reconsider my business relationship with the firm. If they employ someone who casually exhibits this degree of unprofessionalism, especially when it took more time to send an abusive reply than it would have to just … delete the email and never think of it again (even deleting and unsubscribing would have taken less time!), it undermines my trust in their ability to manage my money.

So my question is, should I make someone at the firm aware of his behavior? I could let my own investment manager know, but I’m not sure what he would do about it, other than directing me to someone higher up in the organization. Blasting this guy publicly on LinkedIn isn’t really my style, but a world in which someone can be disproportionately abusive in response to a low-stakes “problem” like a marketing email is not one I want to live in, let alone support by giving them my business. I also understand the logic of letting it go, especially given that the reply came from his personal email address, but it’s really made me mad and I don’t want his conduct to go unacknowledged because acting like it’s okay when it clearly isn’t feels like a tacit endorsement. Should I let his employer know?

Nah, let it go. They won’t care.

I’d argue you shouldn’t really care either. A ton of people forget they’ve subscribed to email lists and then send rude responses when they’re annoyed to receive what they think is spam, not realizing they opted in. Is it rude and, frankly, fruitless? Yes, absolutely. Is it something his employer will care about? Probably not. Will it look extremely strange to contact them about it? Yes.

I don’t want to imply that we should accept casual rudeness as the norm. We shouldn’t! But you’re also kind of overreacting to it in this case. He thought it was spam, he was annoyed and, yes, his response was over the top, but your response to it is also pretty disproportionate.

If this guy were your investment manager, I could see caring a little more — like who is this hothead I have managing my money and how else does he behave when he thinks he’s anonymous? But you’re far enough removed from him that you should just delete his reply and not give it any additional thought. (Or at most, you could reply to say, “You received this message because you opted into our mailing list. I’ll remove you.” But nothing beyond that.)

The post I got an abusive message from an email subscriber — should I let his employer know? appeared first on Ask a Manager.

Page generated Nov. 15th, 2025 01:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios