[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by chavenet

On May 23, a 28-year-old cryptocurrency trader from Italy ran shoeless and bleeding from Duplessie and Woeltz's eight-bedroom townhouse in Manhattan and begged a New York City traffic cop for help. He said the men had held him for more than two weeks, using torture to try to pry loose passwords to his cryptocurrency accounts. They dangled him from the top of five flights of stairs, threatening to kill him if he didn't cough up a ransom, the man alleged in a criminal complaint. from Tequila, Drugs and Torture: The Spending Binge of Two Crypto Bros That Ended Behind Bars [WSJ; ungated]
[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

A reader writes:

I am a clerk at a law firm. There is a customer service aspect to my job, but it’s potential clients calling our main line, or greeting clients for meetings. Nobody would be walking up to my desk unless they were staff or attorneys (no members of the public).

The other day, I got caught using my phone at my desk. This is something I have been talked to about before, and so have other staff.

My boss sent me an email saying that, again, I am not to use my phone at my desk unless it’s for IT verification purposes — which are quick. If I need to be on/check my phone for some emergency, I am to let her know. I responded to her email, saying I understood.

And I do. I might not agree with the policy or like it, but I will comply. I am, as far as I am aware, a good employee who gets requests and projects done in a timely fashion and is friendly and helpful. My phone usage is the only behavioral issue — i.e., not related to work mistakes — I’ve gotten talked to about in the year and a half I’ve been here.

I have a work focus set up so that it blocks most apps from my screen, silences most notifications, etc. And after I left work that day, I moved my messages app from its usual docked spot so I wouldn’t be tempted to check messages throughout the day (because docked apps show up no matter the focus).

I’m not denying phone usage, and I’m not saying I don’t occasionally text throughout the day. When my boss caught me, I was asking my mom if she had an update on a hospitalized friend.

But I do use my phone as a to-do list and I set reminders for things like when to set up for a specific meeting that day or when I need to do daily checks of kitchens. I also use it to track health aspects, like my water intake or food I’ve eaten (for figuring out possible food sensitivities). I can use my watch or desktop apps for some of this, but not all of it (like the food tracking is in a specific app, and I also don’t want my personal stuff on work devices).

I am also not comfortable telling my boss if I have an “emergency,” because I’m worried she’d veto the reason or think it’s not good enough or something like that.

But I do use my phone for reasons that are not texting or scrolling on social media, and I am wondering if I should have explained that. Or should I let this go and just input stuff in on my lunch break or after work?

Well, first, this sounds very micromanagery. If you get all your work done and do it well and don’t seem distracted, and there’s no issue of clients or others thinking they’re not getting your full attention, occasional texting shouldn’t be a big deal.

But apparently this is a thing in your office’s culture, and so you’ve got to work within that reality. If they don’t want you doing personal texting during the day, that’s their prerogative — and since this isn’t the first time they’ve warned you and others about it, it’s something you need to take seriously, regardless of whether or not they should enforce it so strictly.

But you’re absolutely right that personal phones get used in all kinds of other ways that don’t make sense to object to. So one option is to go back to your boss and say, “I want you to know that I’m taking the ban on using phones at our desk seriously, and I’ve silenced my notifications and taken other measures to ensure I’m not violating that. However, I use my phone as a to-do list and for reminders about meetings and to do my daily checks of the kitchens. I also use it to track some medical things, which I don’t want to have on work devices. Is there any flexibility for me to continue to use my phone that way, with the understanding that it would be confined specifically to those things and not used for anything like texting?”

It’s possible she’ll say no, either because she’s a micromanager who doesn’t trust the adults working for her to do their jobs well without excessive restrictions or because she knows it won’t fly in the culture more broadly (like if she doesn’t want to deal with questions from her own boss about why you’re using your phone at your desk). And if it’s no, then it’s no; in that case, yes, you’ll need to just do that stuff on a break or after work. But it’s reasonable to ask if you frame it that way.

The post how can I explain to my boss that my phone usage at work is for my to-do list and health tracking? appeared first on Ask a Manager.

[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

A reader writes:

Two months ago, a colleague introduced me to a colleague at a similar organization to mine. We were trying to figure out if there was merit in working together on a project or not, combining our skills. After my first email, I received an auto-response saying that they might not respond because of the large volume of email they receive and because they are very busy. There was no indication of this auto-response being temporary (no “this week is our annual gala, hence my replies will be slower than normal”) and no other person suggested to approach instead (no “if you are looking for advice on X, please contact Bernice instead”).

I found it strange and was wondering if this is acceptable or not. They did get back to me right away, and we are collaborating now. But that first response left me wondering if I could count on their input on the project bid, given that they had signaled they were so busy (busy enough for the auto-response).

They are of a similar level as I am, and not the author of a best-selling book who might be expecting hundreds of fan mails. To me it came across as not being able to manage the communications that come with the job. We are all busy in our field, so why make yourself the exception? I would not like my employees to use such a generic “I am busy” auto-reply, but am I being too judgmental?

I answer this question over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here.

The post my colleague’s auto-reply says she might never answer your email appeared first on Ask a Manager.

bluedreaming: (pseudonym - snowteeth)
[personal profile] bluedreaming posting in [community profile] fan_flashworks
Fandom: Hyouka (Kotenbu)
Rating: G
Length: 100 words
Content notes: none
Author notes: I always wondered why (Ibara) Mayaka couldn’t just publish manga in the Kotenbu anthology.
Summary: In which Oreki narrowly misses Chitanda’s curiosity.

Read more... )

You Gotta Eat, by Margaret Eby

Aug. 20th, 2025 08:42 am
runpunkrun: Dana Scully reading Jose Chung's 'From Outer Space' in the style of a poster you'd find in your school library, text: Read. (reading)
[personal profile] runpunkrun
You Gotta Eat: Real-Life Strategies for Feeding Yourself When Cooking Feels Impossible, by Margaret Eby:

A gentle and funny book about how to feed yourself when that seems impossible.

This book offers three things: permission, inspiration, and recipes, in about those proportions if this were a list of ingredients. The chapters are arranged in increasing order of effort, from, basically, eating straight out of the fridge, right up to chopping stuff up and turning on the oven.

Each chapter starts with a theme and a bunch of ideas about how to turn things like eggs, greens, beans, noodles, dumplings, and canned foods into a meal, then finishes with one or two basic "do exactly this" recipes. The permission is throughout. Yes, it's okay to eat popcorn for dinner. Yes, a dip is a meal. Yes, you can just eat cheese with your hands. I gotta say, though, there is A LOT of cheese and dairy in this book. And, it's true, if I could eat dairy, a lot of my eating problems would be solved, but alas.

Still, I love the energy of the book and how funny and relentlessly kind Eby is. From the introduction:
When food felt like a chore, I kept reminding myself: the best food is the food that you'll eat. This is the mantra of this book. Michael Pollan famously had three rules for eating: "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." That's nice for him! Here, we're gonna stop with the first one. And we're going to make it easy.
And there are a lot of easy ideas in here! Frittatas! Hummus! Smoothies! For when you're too tired to even chew!

This is more of a survival guide than a cookbook, though, as some of the cooking advice is a bit on the thin side, and if you're new to cooking, you might not know, for example, that you'll want to undercook pasta if you're putting it into a casserole, something Eby fails to mention. The book is probably best for someone who already knows the basics, but just can't imagine lifting a spoon or picking up a frying pan. Eby has a lot of suggestions for things to cook in the toaster oven and the microwave, and the most involved this book gets is casseroles and stirfrys. There are even two (2) quick desserts.

Recommended! Though if you have dietary restrictions, you'll have to do the extra work yourself to make this book work for you (just like every other day) and large sections of it might not, but I think it's still worth it for the inspiration and the reminder to go easy on yourself. You're doing the best you can.
[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

A reader writes:

Am I in the wrong for not wanting to work on projects with my boyfriend/manager at work?

My boyfriend and I both work at the same place. He is the facilities manager and I am the facilities technician.

For the most part we work separately. But from time to time, something comes up where we have to work together, and whenever that happens my stomach starts flip flopping and turning the second I hear that we are going to be working together. I absolutely dread it.

Every time we have worked together in the past, he suddenly changes into almost a different person. He’s mean. He yells at me for everything I do and don’t do.

At first I thought it was me and that I just needed to back off and wait for his direction instead of just jumping in. I thought this because he would yell at me for being in his way and for not knowing how he was trying to do it (but he doesn’t communicate how he wants to do stuff, he just expects me to read his mind and know.) So I tried backing off and waiting for his direction. And doing that results in him yelling at me for standing there doing nothing and not knowing what he wants me to do (for not reading his mind.)

Since neither of those worked, I tried to initiate communication with him before we started and asked him to explain what he wants me to do so I can know going into it and won’t be in his way, slowing him down and am able to contribute what he expects me to. And I’ve told him I don’t want to get yelled at. Well, that doesn’t work either. He gets mad at me for asking questions and tells me I need to follow his directions and shut my mouth. But he doesn’t give me direction, yells at me when I try and get some direction, and yells at me if I try and wing it without asking for direction.

I’m frustrated. I just want to cry. He just informed me that next week we have to work together to replace the siding on one of the cabins on our site. My stomach is doing flip flops and I am stressing out. He saw in my face that I don’t want to work with him and told me that I’m going to have to figure it out.

But I’ve tried to figure it out! Nobody wants to be treated like shit by the person they are working with and if the person you are working with doesn’t communicate with you other than to yell at you, it’s very difficult to work efficiently with them.

I tried to explain that I can’t work with him if he’s going to yell at me the whole time, and he told me that I need to just shut my mouth and follow directions. I feel like he is being super disrespectful and I don’t understand why he acts like this when we work together. It literally doesn’t matter if I do exactly what he tells me to do (if he tells me what to do) or not, because either way he is going to yell at me and tell me how stupid I am. I’ve never been treated like this before by anyone I’ve worked with ever.

I feel like I’ve done and tried everything I can think of to make it work and not get yelled at, and I’m starting to think that maybe the problem isn’t just me. Maybe it’s him. Maybe he is actually being the one that is making it impossible for us to work together? But maybe I’m wrong? Maybe it is me? I don’t know? Am I wrong for not wanting to work with him? Am I wrong for starting to think that maybe he is the issue that we are having? What should I do?

It is not you.

I can tell you with 100% certainty that it’s not you because even if you were the most frustrating person in the world, it would never be okay for a colleague to yell at you and tell you to “just shut up,” and it’s even less okay for an intimate partner to do. That fact that he’s doing that — and not just once but repeatedly, even after you’ve asked him to stop — says that it’s him, not you.

For the record: there are all sorts of issues with him managing his girlfriend — that’s not okay in most businesses, because it’s a huge conflict of interest, opens the company to legal liability, and is unfair to you. (I’m not going to go into all the ways this is bad because it’s not the biggest problem here, but here’s more about that.)

But again: it’s never okay to yell at someone in a professional relationship or a personal one. And sure, people have different things they’re willing to tolerate in a personal relationship, but in a work context it’s unacceptable. It is also never okay to tell someone they need to “shut their mouth.” That’s abusive, disrespectful, and frankly horrible.

The fact that it keeps happening after you’ve talked to him about it says he doesn’t care enough to try to find solutions. He’s willing to continue verbally abusing you. At a minimum, you need to get out of this job — not only because the way he’s treating you is unacceptable, but also because he’s messing with your head and making you question whether you are the problem.

Please think about why you’re wondering if you’re the problem — because I suspect it might that you don’t want to look head-on at the reality that he is the problem, because then you’ll need to deal with what that means about your relationship. Or, maybe you’ve been primed to believe you’re the problem by something in your past — maybe things that happened in your family or lessons that you absorbed growing up, something that taught you that you need to accept treatment like this. But you do not, and should not.

Does anything like this happen with him outside of work? Maybe he’s entirely different at home than he is work … but I’m skeptical.

You asked what you should do, and at a minimum you need to get out of this job so he doesn’t have this specific type of power over you. But you should take a look at the relationship itself, too. I’m sorry.

For anyone who needs it, the Domestic Violence Support hotline is 1-800-799-SAFE(7233) or text START to 88788. Online help is at www.thehotline.org.

The post my boyfriend/manager yells at me when we work together appeared first on Ask a Manager.

[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by toastyk

Stories of survival among Oakland teenagers. SL Medium.

For all the weight these students carry, what may seem surprising to most is how much they still hope. Hope is not always loud. Sometimes it's a quiet kind of resistance, the decision to try again in a world that hasn't given you much reason to. These young people, despite everything they have seen and survived, still hold tight to visions of a better life. And not just for themselves. For their families. For their neighbors. For each other.

How to draw a Space Invader

Aug. 20th, 2025 02:12 pm
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by Wolfdog

How to draw a Space Invader I recently made the Space Invader Generator for Creative Coding Amsterdam code challenge. I made it for fun of course... and galactic domination too! You can see how it looks below and in this post I'll show you how it works using an interactive animation.
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by Faintdreams

Is YouTube secretly applying an AI filter to Shorts without telling creators? SLYT 14 min Rhett Shull asks: "Is YouTube secretly applying an AI filter to Shorts without telling creators?" "I recently noticed my videos looked strange and smeary on YouTube compared to Instagram, almost like a cheap deep fake. In this video, I investigate what's going on and why I believe it's a massive problem for everyone on this platform".

"After talking with Rick Beato and seeing discussions on Reddit about the same "oil painting" effect on videos from creators like Hank Green, it's clear there is some kind of non-consensual AI upscaling being applied to our content. For me, this is a huge issue that threatens to erode the most important thing a creator has: the trust of their audience." Rhett Shull is a Atlanta/Nashville based guitarist who makes gear reviews, how to, lessons and vlogs. CHAPTERS: 00:00 - The Two Videos (Can You See The Difference?) 00:56 - This Is Not an AI Deep Fake 01:42 - Asking a Professional Photographer for Her Opinion 03:11 - The Reddit Thread That Confirmed Everything 05:25 - Why Is YouTube Doing This? (My Theory) 08:00 - Why I Have a Huge Problem With This 08:45 - My Personal "Line in the Sand" For Using AI 10:06 - The Most Important Thing a Creator Has 11:15 - A Freaky Problem Without Creator Consent 12:58 - I Want To Hear From You

Poopcase

Aug. 20th, 2025 08:46 am
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by Wordshore

Indian Express: Russian President Vladimir Putin's bodyguards collect his poop when he travels abroad and carry it back to Russia. LBC: Ex-BBC journalist Farida Rustamova backed up their claims, saying a source told her that this has been practised since Putin first assumed power in 1999. Dailybeast: ...the poop briefcase travels abroad with the Russian delegation to ensure that their leader's feces do not fall into the wrong hands. Human waste carries genetic and lifestyle information that could reveal intimate details about Putin's health. Out of an abundance of caution, the feces is collected, deposited in said briefcase, and returned to the motherland. Reddit (comment): Putin on the Shitz.

Smithsonian library tampered with

Aug. 20th, 2025 07:37 am
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by Narrative_Historian

Metafilter user Mahadevan claims Trump is messing with the Smithsonion and some urgent action can save their data. I'm on holiday so made a post on his behalf.

The History of Deportation in America

Aug. 20th, 2025 07:22 am
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by dmh

A two-hour lecture (transcript) by Historiansplaining on the American practice of deportation, from colonial banishment of heretics, through the political upheaval over Alien & Sedition Acts, to the age of Chinese Exclusion, which paved the way for the federal government to exercise virtually unlimited & absolute power over aliens, whom they placed outside the protection of the Constitution.

Parts 1 and 2 for reference: Part 1: Banishment By Another Name (transcript) Part 2: Expelling the Twentieth Century (transcript) To forestall commentary on the length of the lectures as well as acknowledge an air of ambient animosity on Metafilter towards linear media experiences, I've included links to the YouTube transcripts for visitors who can read faster than they listen. I get it! I used to be like you. These days I've come to appreciate that I retain information differently when I listen to someone speak. Plus I like the cadence.
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by chavenet

Hitler was for the second half of the 20th century and on into the next, what Jesus had been for previous generations: the centre of the moral wheel, around which our ethical instincts turned. Of course, whereas Jesus shaped our moral instincts through positive example, Hitler shaped them by defining what we were against. from Villain of the Peace, Giles Fraser's review of The Age of Hitler and How We Will Survive It by Alec Ryrie [Literary Review; ungated]
mific: (RWRB)
[personal profile] mific posting in [community profile] fanart_recs
Fandom: Red White and Royal Blue (RWRB)
Characters/Pairing/Other Subject: Alex/Henry
Content Notes/Warnings: none
Medium: digital art
Artist on DW/LJ: n/a
Artist Website/Gallery: autiacorart on tumblr
Why this piece is awesome: A bit of fun - a James Bond AU, which they fit remarkably well. Seems like Alex is the "Bond girl" in this one, or possibly the sexy villain, and the king looks to be "M"!
Link: History Never Dies
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by brainwane

Dr. Cat Hicks, dealing with Long COVID, in 2022, wrote a lyrical piece about scary unexplained chest pain, then in 2023, wrote "Talking to doctors about evidence and post covid symptoms": "doctors are bad communicators and frequently bad at evidence reasoning, even ones who might actually know anything about covid. So I usually go into a medical conversation prepared for that. It helps me to decide two goals before every medical conversation..." Includes a downloadable card with a script you can take to medical appointments. (Previously: Dr. Hicks's COVID-related writing, codewords and scripts and techniques for improving medical interactions; Ada Palmer and Maria Farrell on coping with life-changing chronic illness such as Long COVID.)

SGA/SG1: So Good to You by busaikko

Aug. 20th, 2025 04:58 pm
mific: John sheppard looking sad or worried against stone wall, half out of frame (Shep - sad)
[personal profile] mific posting in [community profile] fancake
Fandom: Stargate Atlantis, SG1
Characters/Pairings: John Sheppard/Vala Mal Doran, Cam Mitchell, Rodney McKay, Ronon Dex, Teyla Emmagan
Rating: Teen
Length: 6000
Content Notes: no AO3 warnings apply
Creator Links: busaikko on AO3
Themes: Marriage of Convenience, Teams, Ambiguous relationship, Humor, Friendship

Summary: Rodney had extorted a promise from John to not get recruited into SG-1 while he was on temporary re-assignment to the SGC. As John finished reciting his marriage vows from the crib-sheet Mitchell had handed him, he suspected Rodney would never let him live this down.

Reccer's Notes: With Atlantis stuck in San Francisco, John goes out with SG1 on a mission that needs his gene, but the local Ori-worshipers require those entering the sanctum (where there may be ZPMs) to be married. So John and Vala get hitched, and are able to trade for not one but three ZPMs, which is just as well as later in the story John desperately needs both Vala and the ZPM-power. The story focuses on John and Vala's friendship which develops after their marriage and despite John returning to Pegasus, then later deepens into something more. Cam is initially a dick due to jealousy as he and John had a past fling, but he gets his head out of his ass. The John/Vala relationship is wonderfully written and we're left in the end with it still being an little ambiguous (this is Vala, after all), but definitely hopeful. A lovely read.

Fanwork Links: So Good to You

Cassirer is so cruelly forgotten?

Aug. 20th, 2025 04:59 am
[syndicated profile] metafilter_feed

Posted by HearHere

This was the backdrop to Cassirer and Heidegger's meeting on the mountain at Davos [previously2]. Over the previous decade that backdrop had inspired both thinkers to create their most significant works... rather than attempt to directly answer Kant's question "What is a human being?" [g] Cassirer & Heidegger concentrated on the tacit question that lay behind it, and it is there that their originality is to be found

Humans are beings who must ask themselves questions that they are unable to answer. Fine. But what conditions must in fact exist so that they can actually ask themselves these questions? How is that asking possible? What is the source of this capacity to ask questions about questions? {meta} Cassirer's and Heidegger's answers are to be found in the titles of their main works, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms and Being & Time [g/archive.org], respectively title [larb] inspiration

hitting the wall

Aug. 20th, 2025 12:10 am
twistedchick: watercolor painting of coffee cup on wood table (Default)
[personal profile] twistedchick
I'm putting the Substack column aside for a while. It's just too wearing, looking at the cruelties and misbehavior and idiocy and outright lawlessness of the current regime and writing commentary about it that essentially mirrors what others write.

I need some time not spending up to four days a week writing two columns for no money, columns that are at best depressing.

If I were still at a newspaper doing this, I'd have people who were in the business to bounce ideas off, and some support for the research needed. I am not Robert Reich, who has paid staff. I have me and a computer and occasionally a bookshelf.

And I want to do some lifegiving things for myself, like making more music and creating art and (as long as ICE is not present anywhere near me) going out into the park and breathing the green air of trees. I want to not have the heaviness of the column hanging over my head. I would rather play my flutes, and guitar, and maybe try harp. We have one that belongs to my husband, but he doesn't play often.

And I want to write things like poetry and fiction that don't require me to wear my reductive Inverted-Pyramid-style brain.

So I will notify people, later this week, that it will be more occasional and probably less political.
[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Employees recording conversations without consent

I used to share an office with a group of other managers. One of them was very disgruntled at the time and, unbeknownst to me, was keeping his phone open and recording all the various conversations happening in the office, I think hoping to catch someone in something he could get them in trouble for. I found out about this and brought it to my manager. I felt that it was an invasion of my privacy and felt pretty violated and annoyed. My manager framed it as, “Well, this is a one-party consent state, so there’s nothing we can do.” It was an extremely demoralizing response and one of many ways in which I felt unsupported by my boss. I didn’t realize until later that “one party” means someone in the conversation needs to be one of those parties. Someone can’t just record two people having a conversation they are not involved in themselves. I wish I would have known that at the time and pushed back more!

Anyway, that was an old job that I have thankfully left. However, a friend of mine is in a very similar situation where her employee has recorded multiple one-on-one conversations with my friend. Since that employee is one of the parties in the conversation, my understanding is that this is legal, but is it also realistic to want to shut this down and discipline the employee? My old boss would not have done that; he said since it was legal, there was nothing he could do. So really, my question is twofold: what would you do about the employee who recorded multiple people talking in an office, and what could my friend do to address her employee recording their conversations?

One-party recording laws refer to whether it’s illegal to record someone without their knowledge or consent. It has nothing to do with whether an employer can choose to have policies against surreptitious recording in their own office! An employer absolutely could prohibit that and discipline or fire someone for it, regardless of whether they’re in a one-party-consent state or not. Your manager was being ridiculous and was wrong when he said there was nothing they could do.

As for your friend, at a minimum she needs to tell the employee that she’s not permitted to record in their office without the consent of the people being recorded (or of management, or whatever makes sense for the situation). She also should figure out why the employee was recording her: does the employee feel the manager is saying one thing but then doing another, harassing her, or otherwise engaging in some form of misconduct? Or is it a purely adversarial move? Either way, your friend can prohibit the recording, but figuring out what’s behind it is important to figuring out whether something more than that needs to be done.

2. My team keeps asking me about my feelings

I would love some advice on how to deal with my new “touchy-feely” work group. In the past few months, my immediate team of three people was moved from Division #1 to Division #2. I actually like most of the people I’ll be working with in Division #2 on an individual basis, but the problem is that the division as a whole has a very “touchy-feely” culture that is making me uncomfortable. The thing I’m most uncomfortable with right now is that they start every meeting by asking everyone how they feel that day, and anyone who indicates they’re feeling less than “good” that day is asked if they want to talk about it. As someone who suffers from anxiety and depression (and is in a profession that is being seriously negatively affected by the current administration), I hate this. I don’t want to share my feelings at work, especially in a meeting of 6+ people.

The problem is exacerbated because everyone else almost always indicates that they are feeling “good” at the beginning of every meeting. I’m usually the only one who indicates that I’m feeling “neutral” or “bad.” I feel singled out, and I also feel like I’m going crazy because apparently everyone else is having a great day, even though our profession is going up in flames!

Should I just pretend like I’m feeling “good” at every meeting, or is there a way to get them to stop asking about my feelings all the time?

Yeah, if you say you’re feeling “bad,” it’s virtually guaranteed that any halfway considerate person is going to ask more about it, out of basic politeness if nothing else. The very easy way to solve this is to say you’re “good.” You’re not obligated to provide an honest answer about how you’re feeling if it’s not something you want to get into. (In fact, I’d argue that even if you did want to talk about it, a team meeting wouldn’t necessarily be the place for it anyway.)

So from here onward, your answer is always that you’re “pretty good” or “good” or “doing well” or so forth, and that solves the problem.

I do think it’s probably notable that you’ve felt compelled to answer honestly despite hating it, and it would be interesting to know if you’re overlooking other situations where bland niceties are permissible and would make your life easier!

3. My manager frequently mistypes words

My manager very frequently misspells words, names, and acronyms, or flip flops words in a sentence. For example, he might spell Robert as “Robret” or DHS as “DSH.” Typically there is at least one incorrect spelling per day in his emails. I think it makes our team look unprofessional, but readers can typically still understand the meaning of the email with the incorrect elements. Sometimes, this adds more work for me, because I have to review edits he makes to my documents with a fine-toothed comb. I have a hunch he may be dyslexic or have a similar disability, but he has never shared anything about that with me. Is there anything I can do here to improve the situation?

If you’re good at proofreading and like doing it, you can let him know you like to proofread and are always happy to proof things before they’re sent out, but otherwise no. (And if we’re mostly talking about internal emails, it’s unlikely to be a big deal, assuming your company didn’t hire him as, you know, a proofreader.)

If you were his manager, you could suggest he turn on spellcheck and read things over more carefully, but as his employee it’s not really yours to fix.

For the edits he makes to your work, though, a lot of programs have a Compare Documents function where you can compare two versions of the document and easily see what changed.

Related:
are senior execs too busy for spelling and grammar?

4. LinkedIn is watering down its hate speech policy

Just read this article about LinkedIn removing protections for trans people from their terms of service and wondered if it sparked any thoughts about LinkedIn, or whether your readers might want to know about this if they didn’t spot an article about it.

For people who didn’t click: LinkedIn’s “Hateful and Derogatory Content” page used to include language prohibiting the “misgendering or deadnaming of transgender individuals.” Sometime recently, they quietly deleted it. They also edited their “Harassment and Abusive Content” section to remove “race or gender identity” from what comments targeting others will fall under their hate speech rules.

Yeah, it sparks some thoughts about LinkedIn, and those thoughts are that actively going out of your way to roll back protections on marginalized groups is a real shit move.

5. Including things from elementary school on a resume

My son is a rising college senior. He has been in a pre-health-professions major until this summer but decided that he does not want to continue in that direction (grad school and such). But the demands of the track he’s been on, including requirements for trainings and certifications, job shadowing, and so on mean that his resume is very thin in the work history area. He’s got a job now and so he has a year to improve that aspect, and we can package the trainings and field experiences to show, more or less, that he is trainable and maybe has some skills relevant to what he might want to do. But it’s still a short resume, mostly summer service jobs before this year, and he is applying now for a position that would start after his graduation that requires he submit a current resume.

His dad is recommending that he include some volunteer activities he did a few times in elementary school (“shows he is a good person”) and a national athletic title he won in eighth grade (“shows dedication”). I feel like the risk of having it come out that these were childhood experiences isn’t worth it. I see that you didn’t make strong recommendations about including or omitting hobbies on resumes, and recommended including volunteer activity only it it is relevant. In this situation, balancing the fear of presenting a thin resume with the worry about the filler being quite outdated information, what would you tell him to do?

He 100% should not include anything from elementary school or the eighth grade. It’s just not done on resumes. Work experience from high school, maybe in some cases. But before that, no — and definitely not as far back as elementary school. It would make his judgment look really off and cast him in a childish light.

A short resume with mostly summer jobs is fine for a current college student!

Related:
what to put on a resume when you have zero work experience

The post employees recording conversations, team keeps asking me about my feelings, and more appeared first on Ask a Manager.

Page generated Aug. 24th, 2025 02:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios